跟进：司法部要求法官考虑对移民权益组织处以藐视法庭：名单分析称逾四成不在加州选民档案

华盛顿——美国司法部（Department of Justice）11月1日（周日）向联邦法院提交文件，为其所称加利福尼亚州逾2万名疑似非公民登记选民名单的准确性辩护，并建议法官考虑移民权益组织 Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights（CHIRLA）及其律师是否应因公布对该名单的分析而面临藐视法庭指控。此事发生在11月3日中期选举投票日两天前。

争议源于联邦地区法院首席法官 James Boasberg 10月30日（周五）的命令。Boasberg 准许 CHIRLA 查阅联邦政府关于这2万人的数据，但要求原告不得披露名单上的任何姓名，且数据只能用于论证原告是否有资格挑战特朗普政府使用这份名单。

CHIRLA 的律师10月31日（周六）向法院提交文件，公布了分析结果：名单上逾40%的人并不出现在加州的选民档案中；分析还识别出22名名单上的人很可能已经入籍成为美国公民，并称另有数千名美国公民似乎也在名单之上。

司法部在周日的文件中称，移民权益组织的分析与该组织在本案中的诉讼资格「毫无关系」，因此违反了 Boasberg 的命令。文件写道：「这份报告就所谓不准确之处对加州选民整体的影响大做政治文章，或拿政府名单与完整的『加州选民档案』作比较，与本案具体原告是否有诉讼资格毫无关系。」文件还建议 Boasberg 考虑把此事移交司法部，调查可能的刑事藐视法庭。

为 CHIRLA 提起诉讼并完成数据分析的加州大学洛杉矶分校（University of California, Los Angeles）投票权项目发言人 Alberto Lammers 以电子邮件声明回应：「原告律师及其专家完全遵守了法院的命令。」

在另一起案件中，司法部周日还就联邦地区法官 Trina L. Thompson 周五晚间的裁决提起上诉。Thompson 位于旧金山（San Francisco），其裁决禁止司法部要求选举办公室把疑似非公民从选民名册中除名、隔离其选票或以法律行动相威胁。司法部指出，Thompson 是在联邦政府尚未来得及提交初步论证之前作出裁决的。Thompson 已定于周一（11月2日）就该上诉举行听证。

加州选民名单之争是特朗普政府围绕其疑似非公民选民名单输掉的多起官司之一。此前，加州一名联邦法官已驳回司法部要求选举官员隔离名单上选民所投选票的申请，称这类临近选举的命令可能给该州选举「造成严重破坏」，两名上诉法官随后同意这一判断。加州选举官员称这份名单错误百出，且在选举日临近时，他们没有办法按法律要求逐一完成把选民移出名册所需的细致工作。特朗普政府则称，名单是根据加州自身的选民登记数据、并与联邦公民身份记录比对后审慎编制的；司法部已向加州选举办公室发出一系列传票，并警告明知非公民投票而放行的选举官员可能面临刑事指控。

关联：司法部非公民选民名单扩至五州：法院两度驳回阻止加州计票要求

关联：跟进：法官下令司法部停止以起诉威胁选举官员：不得凭非公民名单除名或隔离选票

（据美联社11月1日报道）

Follow-Up: Justice Department Urges Judge to Consider Contempt Over Voter List Analysis Finding Over 40% Not in California Voter File

Washington — The U.S. Department of Justice on Sunday, November 1, defended the accuracy of its list of more than 20,000 suspected noncitizens registered to vote in California and suggested that a federal judge consider whether the immigrant rights group Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) and its lawyers should face contempt charges after they published an analysis of the names. The filing came two days before the November 3 midterm elections.

The dispute stems from an order issued on Friday, October 30, by U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg, who sits in Washington, D.C. Boasberg allowed CHIRLA access to federal government data on the 20,000 people the Trump administration alleges are noncitizen voters in California, but ordered the plaintiffs not to disclose any names on the list and to use the data only for their arguments about why they have legal standing to challenge the Trump administration's use of it.

On Saturday, October 31, attorneys for the immigrant rights group filed court papers revealing that their analysis found more than 40 percent of the people on the list do not appear in California's voter file. The analysis also identified 22 people on the list who were likely naturalized U.S. citizens, while saying that thousands more U.S. citizens appeared to be on it as well.

The Justice Department said in its Sunday filing that the analysis had nothing to do with the group's legal standing and therefore violated Boasberg's order. "The report's political grandstanding about alleged inaccuracies that purportedly impact California voters generally, or comparisons between the government's list and the full 'California voter file,' has no relevance to whether the particular plaintiffs in this case have standing," it said. The filing also suggested Boasberg refer the matter to the Justice Department for investigation for possible criminal contempt of court.

Alberto Lammers, a spokesman for the University of California, Los Angeles Voting Rights Project, which filed the case and did the data analysis for CHIRLA, said in an emailed statement: "Plaintiffs' counsel and their experts fully complied with the Court's orders."

In a separate case, the Justice Department on Sunday also appealed a decision from Friday night by U.S. District Court Judge Trina L. Thompson. The ruling by the San Francisco-based judge barred the department from demanding that election offices remove possible noncitizens from voter rolls, separate their ballots or threaten legal action. The Justice Department has noted that Thompson ruled before the federal government was able to file its initial arguments. Thompson scheduled a Monday, November 2, hearing on the appeal.

The California list dispute is one of many cases the Trump administration has lost in its battle over its lists of alleged noncitizen voters. A federal judge in California rejected its demand that election officials be forced to separate ballots cast by those voters, writing that such last-minute orders could "wreak havoc" on the state's election, and two appellate judges agreed. California election officials contend the list is riddled with errors and say they have no way to do the painstaking work required by law to remove voters from the rolls in the days before the election. The administration has said its list was carefully compiled from the state's own voter registration data and compared to federal citizenship records. The Justice Department has issued a series of subpoenas for election offices in California and warned election officials who knowingly let noncitizens vote that they could face criminal charges.

Related: Noncitizen Voter Lists Expand to Five States as Courts Twice Decline to Block California Ballots

Related: Follow-Up: Judge Orders Justice Department to Stop Threatening Election Officials Over Noncitizen Voter List

(According to an Associated Press report on November 1)

来源：GSM·美国（原文链接）

图片来源：美国司法部罗伯特·肯尼迪大楼全景（资料图）。APK 摄，CC BY 4.0，经 Wikimedia Commons。 / The Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building (file photo). Photo by APK, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

GSM Global · 本篇英文版 English edition of this story

本频道最新更多 ›

跟进：联邦法官下达临时禁令：禁止司法部以起诉威胁选举工作人员，司法部已上诉2026-11-01司法部非公民选民名单扩至五州：法院两度驳回阻止加州计票要求2026-11-01

← 返回司法　全部新闻　关于我们