特稿《2026年中期选举：选民、物价与战争》
《The Star》栏目组
2026年11月3日，投票已经结束，计票仍在继续。美联社截至11月6日晨的统计显示，众议院435席中已判定405席，民主党249席对共和党156席，余下30席尚未判定；参议院民主党以54席对44席重夺控制权，另两席未判定；德克萨斯州州长选举中，希诺霍萨击败现任州长阿博特。两党众议院普选票约6,021万票对4,684万票，为11月5日统计。这些数字各家都已报道，本篇只作锚点，不再重新写。
本篇不复述全国层面的两院控制权头条。笔者想从最少被报道的层面来读这次选举：州议会、公投案、县级变化、还没判定的胶着选战、谁投票谁没投票、钱的结构。选民最关心的三件事，生活成本、医疗和战争，是全文的线索。两党的说法各占一半，逐句标明出处；德州一节只写得票事实；对2028年的意义只写有来源的说法。
一、结果：数字
选举夜的头条属于国会山，但真正改写政治地图的，是各州的选战与地方的权力更替。先从结果本身看起。
参议院：七个席位易手
选前共和党53席对民主党47席，民主党净增7席。美联社与全国广播公司11月5日的数据显示，民主党54席对共和党44席，密西西比、阿拉斯加两席未判定；同日其他追踪统计在53至55席之间浮动。七个翻盘席位没有一个是民主党席位转给共和党。
北卡罗来纳州，库珀（Roy Cooper）以58.7%对39.1%击败迈克尔·沃特利（Michael Whatley），差距19.6个百分点。这是当晚第一个翻盘，美联社于东部时间20:23判定；该州自2008年以来首次有民主党人赢得参议员席位，席位原属退休的汤姆·蒂利斯（Thom Tillis）。上一次同席位选举，2020年共和党领先1.8个百分点。
德克萨斯州，塔拉里科（James Talarico）以55.1%对43.0%击败帕克斯顿（Ken Paxton），5,445,121票对4,249,752票，差距12.1个百分点。塔拉里科是德克萨斯州自1988年劳埃德·本特森（Lloyd Bentsen）以来首位民主党参议员；帕克斯顿在共和党初选中击败了约翰·科宁（John Cornyn）。这场竞选是全美最贵的参议员竞选。
东北角的缅因州，上演的是挑战现任者的选战。
缅因州，杰克逊（Troy Jackson）以53.8%对46.1%击败现任参议员苏珊·柯林斯（Susan Collins），差距约7个百分点；另一种统计为53.4%对46.5%，差距一致。柯林斯自1996年起任职，寻求第六任期。2020年同席位共和党领先8.6个百分点。
俄亥俄州补选，布朗（Sherrod Brown）以50.0%对45.2%击败现任参议员赫斯特德（Jon Husted），2,301,042票对2,077,748票，任期至2029年1月3日。2022年同席位共和党领先6.1个百分点。
艾奥瓦州，图雷克（Josh Turek）以50.5%对46.4%击败欣森（Ashley Hinson），686,487票对630,615票。这是锁定参议院多数的判定，美联社于东部时间23:35判定；席位原属退休的乔尼·恩斯特（Joni Ernst）；该州自2008年以来首次有民主党人赢得参议员席位。
还有领先中的席位没有落定，先记在这里。
堪萨斯州，汉密尔顿（Adam Hamilton）领先约4.9个百分点；堪萨斯上一次有民主党参议员是1932年。南卡罗来纳州，安德鲁斯（Annie Andrews）领先约4.4个百分点；该席自1964年斯特罗姆·瑟蒙德（Strom Thurmond）转党后一直在共和党手中。
另有两席是守住，不是翻盘：密歇根州，埃尔-赛义德（Abdul El-Sayed）于11月4日东部时间2:27获美联社判定胜出，成为首位当选联邦参议员的穆斯林，该席为民主党守住；佐治亚州奥索夫（Jon Ossoff）连任，佛罗里达州特别选举穆迪（Ashley Moody）胜出，均为守住。
参议院之外，各州州长官邸也在这个夜晚换了主人。
州长：五个席位易手
36个州长席位改选。选前共和党26州对民主党24州；选后民主党至少28州对共和党20州，堪萨斯、阿拉斯加两州未判定。美联社称，民主党首次自2006年以来掌握多数州长席位。
德克萨斯州，希诺霍萨以52.8%对45.7%击败现任州长阿博特（美联社，98%选票已计）。佐治亚州，博托姆斯（Keisha Lance Bottoms）以54.3%对45.7%胜出，成为该州首位黑人女性州长；佐治亚上一次民主党州长离任为2003年。俄亥俄州，阿克顿（Amy Acton）以52.3%对44.4%胜出，成为该州首位民选女性州长；俄亥俄上一次民主党州长在2010年选举之前。艾奥瓦州，桑德（Rob Sand）以55.5%对44.5%胜出，打破共和党对州政府十年的控制。内华达州，福特（Aaron Ford）以51.7%对44.2%击败现任州长隆巴多（Joe Lombardo），民主党在该州同时掌握州长与州议会两院，形成三重执政。
德克萨斯州与内华达州是现任州长落败；俄亥俄、艾奥瓦、佐治亚是共和党人离任后的空缺席。特朗普背书的22名州长候选人中10人胜出、11人落败，阿拉斯加未定；特朗普背书的27名竞逐民主党席位的候选人，截至11月4日东部时间15时无人翻盘（《今日美国》分析）。
比州长更安静、影响却更深远的，是各州议会里的权力交接。
州议会：至少九个议院易手
至少九个州立法议院由共和党转民主党，全部转向民主党；另有统计称“有望翻盘12个议院”（Axios，经Newsmax转引，统计方法见文末说明）。七个州出现议会控制权变化（MultiState，截至11月4日东部时间18:45）：新罕布什尔、威斯康星两院全翻；密歇根众议院、明尼苏达众议院（原为67比67平局）、宾夕法尼亚参议院、北卡罗来纳众议院、德克萨斯州众议院各翻一院。阿拉斯加、亚利桑那、佐治亚三州议会控制权当时未定。
新罕布什尔州，众议院民主党292席，参议院15比9；共和党州长阿约特（Kelly Ayotte）连任，但议会两院翻盘，该州共和党三重执政因此终结。威斯康星州，参议院民主党翻转三席，共18席，众议院翻转全部八个目标席位，53比46，终结共和党自2011年以来的议会多数；州长克劳利（David Crowley，民主党）胜选。宾夕法尼亚州，州长夏皮罗（Josh Shapiro）宣称参议院26比24，终结共和党对该院32年的控制；该州为自1994年以来首次民主党同时掌握州长与议会两院，自1992年以来首次三重执政。
亚利桑那州，州长霍布斯（Katie Hobbs）连任；民主党有望翻转两院，若成行，为该州自1966年以来首个三重执政、60年来首次完全议会控制。密歇根州众议院翻盘、参议院守住，州长本森（Jocelyn Benson，民主党）胜选，形成三重执政。明尼苏达州众议院在67比67平局后由民主党拿下、参议院守住，州长克洛布彻（Amy Klobuchar，民主党）胜选，形成三重执政。北卡罗来纳州众议院翻盘，选前共和党71席对民主党49席，选后民主党在120席中占70席，参议院仍为共和党，该州由共和党控制转为分治。德克萨斯州众议院翻盘，为共和党自2002年选举后掌控以来首次民主党控制，参议院仍为共和党。佐治亚州众议院民主党领先，若翻盘为2004年选举前以来首次民主党控制，当时未定。
三重执政的变化：民主党新增三重执政的州为密歇根、明尼苏达、内华达、宾夕法尼亚、威斯康星；共和党失去三重执政的州为佐治亚、艾奥瓦、俄亥俄、德克萨斯（全国州议会联合会，另有统计称五州，含新罕布什尔）。民主党三重执政共22州对共和党18州（Newsmax引美联社）。民主党打破或阻止了八个州九个议院的共和党超级多数：佛罗里达、南卡罗来纳、印第安纳、密苏里、艾奥瓦、俄亥俄、堪萨斯、北卡罗来纳。民主党若当前领先保持，将控制全美99个立法议院中的51个，选前为39个。全国州议会联合会选举与选区重划主任凯蒂·欧文斯·哈布勒（Katie Owens Hubler）称，这是自2010年以来州政府党派权力单次选举的最大变化。
选民在那个夜晚不只是在选人，也在直接决定摆在面前的政策问题。
公投案：选民在候选人之外直接投票
加州14项全州公投案（2026年11月4日初步结果，邮寄选票仍在计）：第39号提案（要求出示选民身份证件）被否决，约59%投反对票（美联社：58.6%反对对41.4%支持，约60%选票已计）。第40号提案（对资产逾10亿美元者一次性征收5%税，90%用于医疗）仍未判定：截至11月5日晚间美联社实时统计，反对4,733,204票、支持3,928,206票，反对约55%领先，美联社尚未判定。第3号提案（高收入者临时所得税永久化，用于学校与医疗）通过，58.7%。第1号提案（住房债券112.5亿美元）通过，59%赞成；第37号提案（250亿美元购房者低息贷款计划）通过，61%赞成；第2号提案（提高雨天基金上限）通过，60%赞成。第44号提案（社区诊所开支要求）被否决，约82%投反对票。第41号与第42号提案是与第40号竞争的替代方案：第42号领先、支持率55%，第41号落后（47.5%对52.5%）；两案规定，若其中任一案以多于第40号的赞成票通过，第40号不得生效。第5号提案（改变罢免选举程序）领先不足一个百分点，为最可能随计票翻转的议案；第45号提案（环境审查规则修改）落后约八个百分点。州长选举中，贝塞拉（Xavier Becerra，民主党）击败希尔顿（Steve Hilton），美联社于太平洋时间20:12判定，领先近28个百分点。
其他州的公投案（Ballotpedia汇总）：堕胎方面，密苏里修正案3、爱达荷提案1未通过，内华达问题6、弗吉尼亚问题1通过。基本权利方面，弗吉尼亚问题2（婚姻平等）、佛蒙特提案4（反歧视）、佛蒙特提案3（工会）、阿肯色议题4（清洁水资金）通过。学校方面，亚拉巴马修正案3、4（宣誓、祈祷、国歌）通过；亚利桑那提案142（禁DEI）未通过、提案318（跨性别洗手间与体育）通过；内布拉斯加倡议442（按生理性别参加体育）通过；北达科他议题2（免费校餐）未通过。投票与选举方面，阿拉斯加议题3、阿肯色议题1、堪萨斯公民投票要求、南达科他修正案J、西弗吉尼亚公民投票要求通过；弗吉尼亚修正案3（恢复重罪犯投票权）通过；蒙大拿I-194（禁企业捐款）通过。选民身份证件方面，九个州有要求出示带照片身份证件或仅限公民投票的议案，除两个州外均已通过：俄亥俄问题1以65.3%通过；亚利桑那提案144在约85%选票已计时以53.2%反对、46.8%支持被否决边缘。
数据中心的地方公投是另一个少被报道的层面：41项地方公投案中40项结果有利于限制数据中心开发：27项批准限制、13项否决了有利于开发的提案。批准的限制包括5项全面禁令（加州、佛罗里达、俄亥俄）、12项部分禁令（堪萨斯、缅因、俄亥俄）、缅因州3项六个月暂停、俄亥俄州亚当斯县2项分区管制。俄亥俄州18个市镇全部通过限制数据中心发展的公投。唯一有利于开发的结果是北达科他州哈伍德1项审查要求议案被否决。
也有几场选战，选举夜过去了，胜负却迟迟没有落定。
还没判定的胶着选战
密西西比州参议员：民主党人科洛姆（Scott Colom）领先共和党现任参议员海德-史密斯（Cindy Hyde-Smith）。截至11月5日下午美联社实时统计，科洛姆466,775票对海德-史密斯464,962票，领先1,813票，99.83%的选区已报，美联社尚未判定。领先幅度在计票中多次变化：选举夜一度只领先43票，11月5日上午的统计为领先1,724票。约3,600张邮寄选票仍可收取，宣誓选票待核，地方认证截止11月13日；该州没有重新计票法。
阿拉斯加州参议员：民主党人佩尔托拉（Mary Peltola）首选票领先共和党现任参议员沙利文（Dan Sullivan）637票，约75,000张选票仍未计，排序投票将于11月18日进行。按已公布选票的初步排序投票模型测算，两人接近平局，沙利文在计入备选排序后略微领先。这是初步模型，不是结果。
阿拉斯加州长、堪萨斯州长同样未判定：堪萨斯州，霍尔舍（Holscher）50.3%对马斯特森（Masterson）49.7%；阿拉斯加州，克雷斯-汤姆金斯（Kreiss-Tomkins）49.2%对威尔逊（Wilson）29.2%，据全国广播公司11月4日12:30预测。众议院截至11月5日凌晨全国广播公司数据，42席未判定；民主党翻转众议院席位的数字在动，《今日美国》11月4日晚称32席，Decision Desk HQ计31席，各为不同时点快照。
把时间倒回投票日之前，这场选举其实早早就开始了。
提前投票：5,753万张，创纪录
佛罗里达大学选举实验室截至11月2日东部时间18:40统计，提前投票57,530,789张，其中现场提前投票31,872,117张、寄回邮寄选票25,658,672张。2022年中期选举提前投票最终为45,920,446张；2026年约多出1,160万张，增幅约24%至25%，法新社称创中期选举纪录。提前投票最多的州是德克萨斯州逾770万张、佛罗里达州逾540万张。总投票率尚无核实的最终总数；全国广播公司决策台估计，截至投票日18:30的总体投票率与2022年同期相近。
提前投票的党派构成（27个公布党派登记的州）：民主党约占43%至44%，共和党约占31%至32%，无党派或小党约25%。登记党派不等于投票选择，多家来源均注明这一点。
年龄构成是别人少用的数据：全国18至29岁约占提前投票选民的8%，30至39岁约占9%，40岁以下合计约17%；40岁以下提前或缺席投票约910万人，其中18至29岁近350万人，较2022年同期增长59%。各州快照显示，65岁以上占提前选票半数以上者居多：密歇根65岁以上60.5%、18至29岁5.5%；佛罗里达65岁以上56.9%、18至24岁2.8%；俄亥俄65岁以上56.5%、18至24岁3.5%；加州65岁以上52.9%、18至24岁4.0%；佐治亚65岁以上41.4%、18至24岁5.2%。佐治亚18至29岁提前投票约31万人，占280万张提前选票的约11%；50岁以上占提前选票近65%；提前投票前九天，30岁以下现场投票较2022年同期增长54%，年轻黑人选民增长80%。达拉斯—沃斯堡四县（达拉斯、塔兰特、科林、登顿）截至10月28日，65岁以上登记选民投票率约50.5%，18至29岁仅18.4%；65岁以上投票率约为30岁以下的2.7倍。
选票之外，还有钱的战线，看不见，却无处不在。
钱的结构
联邦选举委员会12个月统计（经汇总）：国会候选人筹款14.9亿美元、支出8.519亿美元；政治行动委员会筹款46.1亿美元、支出34.4亿美元；外部团体独立支出25.1亿美元，其中保守派团体13.3亿美元、自由派8.8亿美元、无党派或单一议题团体3.026亿美元。
小额捐款的结构差别明显：民主党国会候选人收到200美元以下捐款5.887亿美元，共和党1.4亿美元；小额捐款占民主党筹款44%、共和党34%；2,500美元以上捐款占共和党筹款37%、民主党25%。具体候选人：塔拉里科小额捐款7,530万美元，帕克斯顿537万美元；奥索夫小额捐款6,610万美元，对手迈克·柯林斯（Mike Collins）272万美元。ActBlue（民主党主要在线筹款平台）捐款人由490万增至约660万；WinRed（共和党主要在线筹款平台）本周期约150万捐款人；塔拉里科一人吸引的ActBlue捐款人约相当于共和党全部候选人与委员会通过WinRed获得的捐款人总数。ActBlue自报，2026年第三季度处理8.33亿美元，为历来最佳非总统选举季度，较2022年同期增长29%。
大额捐款方面：马斯克9月向参议院领袖基金一笔捐款1.58亿美元，约占该基金当月全部收入的58%；该基金已支出3.587亿美元。塔拉里科周期筹款逾1.34亿美元，第三季度单季6,400万美元，其中约97%的捐款为100美元或以下；奥索夫筹款1.092亿美元，第三季度逾98%的捐款低于100美元、平均38美元。VoteHub的分析警告，不要把筹款视为选举结果的决定性预测指标：“竞选财务不是11月选举表现的最清晰信号。”
二、选民怎么说
数字讲的是结果，选民的回答讲的是原因。
美联社选民民调由SSRS为美联社、美国广播公司、哥伦比亚广播公司、有线电视新闻网、福克斯新闻媒体、全国广播公司与Versant执行，50个州逾100,000名选民，阿拉斯加10月19日至11月3日、其他州10月22日至11月3日。
最关心的议题：约九成选民称生活成本是其国会投票的“关键”或“重要”因素，其中约六成支持民主党众议院候选人。政府腐败与生活成本并列首位：约半数选民称政府腐败与生活成本对其国会投票“至关重要”；全国广播公司出口民调中，约九成受访者分别将生活成本与政府腐败列为关键或重要因素。美联社／全国广播公司选民民调初步数据（11月4日）显示，称各议题为投票的关键或重要因素的比例为：政府腐败90%、生活成本89%、伊朗战争74%、移民执法73%、人工智能与数据中心56%。约四成选民称经济为国家最重要议题，约三成称民主状况。
选前民调对照：美联社—全国民意研究中心10月8日至12日民调（1,119名成年人，抽样误差±3.9个百分点）显示，85%称经济、84%称生活成本为最重要议题；74%不认可特朗普对经济的处理、79%不认可其对生活成本的处理；64%不认可特朗普整体表现；八成希望国家运行方式出现重大变革或彻底颠覆。路透社／益普索民调显示，47%的登记选民称生活成本是其投票的最重要因素，73%认为生活成本正朝着错误方向发展。盖洛普10月29日民调显示，经济与医疗各以50%并列“极其重要”，伊朗冲突47%、收入不平等44%、汽油价格42%、移民40%。
物价与战争的归因，只写民调数字：约三分之二选民称特朗普本人的政策助长了通胀；2022年中期选举时仅约半数选民将通胀归咎于拜登的政策。消费者价格过去12个月上涨3.7%，高于特朗普第二任期开始时的3%通胀率。约六成选民称美国对伊朗采取军事行动是“错误决定”；约六成称政府移民执法“做得过头”，相似比例不认可移民与海关执法局的工作表现。86%的美国人称战争对生活成本有害，包括76%的共和党人。约四分之三选民称对国家发展方向感到“愤怒”或“不满”，仅约四分之一称“满意”或“热情”。约六成选民支持政府发挥更大作用以降低医疗成本；约六成认为人工智能将危害社会，担心工作流失与财务不稳定。经济信任度方面，2024年特朗普领先7个百分点，转为2026年民主党领先6个百分点。
把人群拆开看，分化就藏在年龄与族裔的交叉里。
年龄与族裔的交叉细分：18至29岁支持民主党众议院候选人72%对25%；30至44岁60%对36%；45至64岁51%对47%；65岁以上48%对51%。首次投票的18至24岁选民支持民主党76%对21%。2024年18至29岁选民支持特朗普55%对42%。约九成黑人选民支持民主党众议院候选人，高于2024年支持哈里斯的约八成；黑人女性几乎一致支持民主党；仅约一成黑人男性支持共和党，低于2024年支持特朗普的约四分之一。西语裔选民约六成支持民主党众议院候选人，仅约三分之一支持共和党；2024年约四成西语裔选民投票给特朗普。约七成西语裔选民称特朗普的政策恶化了美国经济状况。
温和派与低收入选民的选择，安静却关键。
温和派与低收入选民：八成温和派选民称国会在制约总统权力方面做得“不够”。收入低于5万美元的选民中，39%称通胀造成严重困难，高收入者为15%；过半数低收入选民在2026年选择民主党，而2024年该群体在特朗普与哈里斯之间平分。六成30岁以下选民称其投票明确是反对总统；约七成选民希望国会在制约总统权力方面做得更多。
数据中心也进入了选民的投票考量：全国广播公司民调显示，23%的选民称数据中心在其投票中起了“关键”作用，33%认为该议题关键。马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校9月民调显示，仅11%的美国人赞成在其居住地建设数据中心，65%反对。田纳西州谢尔比县（孟菲斯市，马斯克Colossus数据中心所在地）民主党得票率由71%升至约85%。
三、两党怎么说
胜负落定，复盘随即开始。先听胜选方怎么说。
民主党方面
众议院民主党领袖杰弗里斯（Hakeem Jeffries，有望成为议长）接受有线电视新闻网采访时说：“我们竞选时主打可负担性，以可负担性赢得了决定性胜利，现在我们有责任以可负担性执政。”他还说：“你们将拥有一个认识到我们不是为总统工作的国会。”以及“我们将为美国腹地而奋斗。”众议院民主党党团将于下周开会并公布议程，新多数的重点为“可负担性与问责”。杰弗里斯在同一采访中称，民主党仍有责任确保特朗普政府中的“不法者被追究责任”。
参议院民主党领袖舒默（Chuck Schumer，有信心当选多数党领袖）称结果为“代际性”重新调整，同时警告本党没有空白支票去推行超出美国人意愿的立法：“选民给我们多数席位不是让我们为所欲为。”胜选演说中，他对支持民主党的美国人说五个字：“救济正在路上。”11月5日，他在美国进步中心主办的华盛顿论坛上称，降低成本必须成为首要任务，可负担性“必须是最主要的事”。舒默向记者称，民主党将致力于降低物价，同时在认为政府违法时展开调查。
民主党新一届国会共识议程（路透社采访新当选与连任议员）：使奥巴马医改医保计划更可负担、撤销特朗普对医疗补助（Medicaid，面向贫困人口的政府医保计划）的部分削减、终结关税与伊朗战争。民主党计划（《华尔街日报》，经Newsmax转引）：重新审议特朗普的大规模税收与开支法，包括医疗补助工作要求、食品援助削减与有利于企业及富裕美国人的税收条款；恢复扩大的《平价医疗法案》补贴、处理住房成本、考虑修改社会保障融资（包括提高工资税收入上限）；挑战特朗普关税、处理能源价格、寻求结束伊朗战争（美国广播公司）。
民主党内部的分歧（路透社）：除广泛认同处理“可负担性”外，民主党在选民是否授权其大力调查特朗普及其家人、推动弹劾或拥抱“全民医保”等进步派优先事项上存在分歧。路透社引述一名未具名民主党领袖的话：“我还没有一名众议院民主党党团成员跟我谈过弹劾。”问责工作将由众议院司法委员会民主党领袖拉金（Jamie Raskin，马里兰州）与众议院监督委员会民主党领袖加西亚（Robert Garcia，加州）领导。
参议员范霍伦（Chris Van Hollen，马里兰州民主党人，曾暗示可能竞选2028年总统）称，民主党需要同时推进多个目标，包括追究政府“严重腐败”的责任、努力结束伊朗战争、团结在针对工薪阶层美国人的积极经济议程之后。民主党全国委员会主席马丁（Ken Martin）称，结果反映了帮助特朗普赢得白宫的群体出现更广泛转向。劳工活动人士杰亚拉曼（Saru Jayaraman，主张提高联邦最低工资）称，民主党应“亮出底牌”，提出希望构成其总统竞选纲领的政策主张；“赢得2028年大选还有什么比在众议院和参议院通过这些法案、放到总统桌上、看他是否签署更好的办法？”伊利诺伊州州长普里茨克（JB Pritzker）在美国进步中心活动上称，医疗债务与学生债务也是民主党应在联邦层面处理的问题，监督与可负担性应为明年国会的主要重点。
民主党战略人士索斯尼克（Doug Sosnik，路透社）说：“昨晚的结果，各派民主党人都能从中找到肯定。”他还说，进步派与温和派都将声称其意识形态路径得到验证，2028年竞选正式开始时将出现激烈的党内斗争。
共和党那边的复盘，从白宫开始。
共和党方面
总统特朗普对副总统万斯称伊朗战争是共和党败选原因的说法，表示“基本属实”，但表示不后悔。他告诉记者，伊朗战争“短期内让汽油涨了一点”，但他认为为阻止伊朗推进核武器而战是值得的。在德克萨斯州州长选举后，他在社交媒体发帖，称阿博特为“RINO”（名义上的共和党人）。投票日当晚，他曾呼吁选民假装他也在选票上；选后一天，他前往在建的白宫舞厅工地并谈论非选举事务（《今日美国》11月4日滚动报道）。
副总统万斯（JD Vance）在社交媒体写道：“我们输的原因是战争。”他还说：“总统本人昨晚自己也这么说了。”据Blaze Media对其社交媒体长文的汇总，万斯称，共和党输掉的原因是许多2024年投票给特朗普／万斯的选民这次出来投票却投了民主党；民调显示倒戈的首要原因为结束战争、聚焦生活成本／通胀、美国优先、改变与以色列的关系。他为雷切尔·坎波斯-达菲（Rachel Campos Duffy）辩护，警告不要出现预期的“洗白”与特赦提议，并呼吁支持者把愤怒转化为选出志同道合的共和党人。
德克萨斯州参议员克鲁兹（Ted Cruz，共和党，2028年总统竞选意向公开，不在2030年前改选）在11月4日社交媒体长文中写道：“德州是蓝的。这句话很难说出口。但今天，至少今天，德州是蓝的。”“截至今天，我是德克萨斯州仅剩的州级当选共和党人。这是我从未想过会说的话。”他还写道：“2026年不只是一场蓝色浪潮；它是一场蓝色海啸。它是一次痛击。它不只是一场糟糕的2006年中期选举。它是一场水门事件级别的否决。”克鲁兹说：“关税让一切都太贵了，伊朗战争拖得太久了。”“选民很愤怒，当选的共和党人没有为解决他们非常真实的痛苦做足够的事。”他呼吁特朗普结束仍在进行的战争，并致电当选参议员塔拉里科表示祝贺。克鲁兹还说：“德州会重新变红。”“我们将重建成为一个真正的蓝领政党，不是拥抱社会主义，而是成为真正的自由市场保守派。”他警告民主党将“越界”“过头”，可能推动其所称的“激进跨性别议程”，“许多美国人将受到伤害。德克萨斯州人将受到伤害。”他称，共和党失去了关键选民：蓝领选民、福音派基督徒、农民与牧场主、年轻人、西语裔，因为该党在解决他们的痛苦方面做得不够。
众议院议长约翰逊（Mike Johnson，路易斯安那州共和党人）数周来声称民调有误、共和党将“违背历史”保住众议院多数；现已表示不再竞选众议院少数党领袖（有线电视新闻网）。
德克萨斯州共和党选民（《华盛顿检查者报》报道，经Newsmax转引）中，至少部分人将败选归咎于特朗普与国会共和党领袖；有人同时将责任归于参议院多数党领袖图恩（John Thune，南达科他州）与众议院议长约翰逊；选民提及的因素包括特朗普关税、消费价格上涨、伊朗战争与强硬移民执法；有人要求在2028年总统选举前更换领导层。35岁杂货店店员史蒂夫·孟（Steve Meng）说：“2028年，我想对共和党说：摆脱特朗普和万斯，继续前进。”
有线电视新闻网的分析（非引述）认为，特朗普让竞选压倒性地围绕他本人；他在共和党初选中干预，产生了一批较难当选的候选人（2018年的重演）；他在竞选最后阶段驳斥可负担性关切，并多次聚焦林肯纪念堂倒影池等不受欢迎的议题；共和党人仍明显不敢指责他。
四、德克萨斯州
所有故事里，德克萨斯州这篇最值得单独展开。
结果数字
州长：希诺霍萨5,230,929票对阿博特4,524,955票（美联社，99%选区已报）。希诺霍萨为德克萨斯州首位拉丁裔州长；为自1990年安·理查兹（Ann Richards）当选以来首位民主党州长（理查兹任期1991至1995年）；民主党自1994年以来首次赢得德克萨斯州全州选举。阿博特于投票日晚约22时（中部时间）致电希诺霍萨祝贺，称“看过全州每个县的所有细节后，我决定致电祝贺她赢得德克萨斯州州长竞选……从数学上讲，我们赢不了这场选举。”希诺霍萨将于2027年1月19日就职。
参议员：塔拉里科5,445,121票对帕克斯顿4,249,752票，55.1%对43.0%。副州长：古德温（Vikki Goodwin）以51.7%击败现任丹·帕特里克（Dan Patrick，45.7%）。司法部长由民主党人赢得；铁路委员会由罗森塔尔（Jon Rosenthal）胜出，成为首位当选德克萨斯州全州行政职务的犹太裔候选人。民主党有望赢得选票上的每一个全州职务，并有机会夺得德克萨斯州众议院控制权（《今日美国》11月4日）。
德克萨斯州众议院：民主党至少净增18席（非官方结果）；控制权归属未定；若翻盘，为共和党自2002年选举后掌控以来首次民主党控制。共和党有望保住德克萨斯州参议院（《德克萨斯论坛报》，经Daily Caller转引）。
阿博特背景：三届州长，前三次州长竞选均以两位数优势获胜；今年年初手握逾1亿美元资金；7月至9月下旬在广告上大幅超过希诺霍萨（《今日美国》评论文章称广告支出为6比1，另一种统计称5比1，统计方式不同，见文末说明）。
州层面的结果之外，县层面的地图变化更能说明问题。
县级变化
德克萨斯州254个县全部向民主党方向移动，无一县向共和党移动；中位数移动17.7个百分点；移动最小的金县（King County）为6.6个百分点（共和党优势由+91.1变为+84.5）；移动最大的斯塔尔县（Starr County）为71.8个百分点。2024年特朗普赢得的28个县在2026年投票给塔拉里科。数据为德克萨斯州州务卿非官方结果（截至11月4日东部时间11:48，部分县未完全统计）。
边境县：斯塔尔县由2024年特朗普领先16.0个百分点变为塔拉里科领先55.8个百分点；萨帕塔县（Zapata）移动63.1个百分点；马弗里克县（Maverick）移动59.5个百分点；韦布县、伊达尔戈县、卡梅伦县（各逾5万张参议员选票）分别移动49.5、49.3、44.3个百分点。布鲁斯特县（Brewster County，大本德国家公园所在地）：2022年阿博特领先近9个百分点，2024年特朗普领先13个百分点、克鲁兹领先逾10个百分点，2026年希诺霍萨以8个百分点翻盘，塔拉里科以逾10个百分点获胜。斯塔尔县：2024年特朗普领先16个百分点、克鲁兹领先2个百分点，2026年希诺霍萨领先近50个百分点、塔拉里科领先近55个百分点。马弗里克县：2024年克鲁兹领先3个百分点，2026年塔拉里科领先45个百分点。
郊区与大城市县：科林县（Collin）由特朗普+11.1变为塔拉里科+12.1；登顿县（Denton）由+13.1变为+8.4；威廉姆森县（Williamson）由+2.5变为+20.3；三县2024年均投票给特朗普、2026年均投票给塔拉里科。沃斯堡所在的塔兰特县翻盘（特朗普+5.1变为塔拉里科+19.2）；哈里斯县向民主党移动27.4个百分点、贝克斯县25.7个、达拉斯县23.3个、特拉维斯县19.2个。福遍县（Fort Bend）移动27.6个百分点（仅202个选区中的100个已报告）。
农村县：全州171个农村县在州长与参议员竞选中全部向民主党移动；州长竞选农村德克萨斯州较2022年向民主党移动逾8个百分点，参议员竞选较2024年移动7.5个百分点（2024年为总统选举年，投票率模式与中期选举不同，不可直接平行比较）；农村选民占选民比例约10.5%，低于2022年中期的11.3%。全州16个边境县整体向民主党移动逾8个百分点。
里奥格兰德河谷四县（卡梅伦、伊达尔戈、斯塔尔、威拉西）：塔拉里科与希诺霍萨得票率约在60%至70%以上；伊达尔戈县塔拉里科逾72%、希诺霍萨逾70%；卡梅伦县2024年特朗普得票52%，2026年特朗普阵营得票30%、希诺霍萨70%（拉美裔公民联盟主席多明戈·加西亚，经FOX 7奥斯汀报道）；韦布县（拉雷多）移动26个百分点，帕克斯顿得票25%、特朗普2024年得票51%；马弗里克县特朗普2024年得票59%，2026年帕克斯顿得票28%、塔拉里科与希诺霍萨得票72%。据拉美裔公民联盟数据，德克萨斯州约160万拉丁裔选民投票，接近上届中期选举90万人的两倍；拉丁裔占多数的县合计72%的选票投给民主党。
州议会席位（里奥格兰德河谷）：洛佩斯（Janice Lopez，圣贝尼托州众议员）HD-37席位输给奥乔亚（Oziel Ochoa），翻回民主党；科珀斯克里斯蒂的维拉洛沃斯（Denise Villalobos，共和党现任州众议员）落败；卡兰萨（Kristian Carranza）击败博雷戈（Jorge Borrego）赢得HD-118（圣安东尼奥东南部郊区）；萨利纳斯（Julio Salinas，进步派、获伯尼·桑德斯支持）在麦卡伦击败共和党人加里·格罗夫斯（Gary Groves）赢得HD-41。
为什么会翻盘？各方的说法都摆在这里，读者可以对照着看。
翻盘原因：只写有来源的说法，两党说法都要有
民主党方面与相关分析的说法：拉丁裔选民回流。拉丁裔约占德克萨斯州选民的30%至三分之一（德克萨斯州政治学家布兰登·罗廷豪斯，Brandon Rottinghaus；《今日美国》）。特朗普2024年赢得德克萨斯州拉丁裔选票55%，较2020年上升13个百分点、较2016年上升27个百分点，创共和党总统候选人纪录；并赢得里奥格兰德河谷全部四个县，民主党对该地区保持了一个世纪的控制。选前民调：Equis Research 10月民调显示，拉丁裔选民中塔拉里科以58%对33%领先帕克斯顿，希诺霍萨以59%对35%领先阿博特；BSP Research为UnidosUS所作民调显示，塔拉里科在拉丁裔选民中以65%对31%领先，在里奥格兰德河谷以74%对24%领先。美联社选民民调显示，德克萨斯州参议员竞选中约六成西语裔选民支持塔拉里科，约三成支持帕克斯顿；2024年该州西语裔选民在特朗普与哈里斯之间分歧要大得多。
罗廷豪斯的分析是，民主党在德克萨斯州传统上获得约60%的拉丁裔选票，2024年周期降至接近50%，今年数字回升；拉丁裔占多数社区的高支持率是塔拉里科累计票数的主要原因；结果显示德克萨斯州正变得更具政治竞争性，拉丁裔投票模式、郊区社区与传统共和党农村县的变化共同推动了民主党的成功。议题方面，Equis Research 10月民调显示，物价上涨与移民执法是拉丁裔选民最关心的两个议题。皮尤调查显示，61%的拉丁裔受访者称自特朗普上任以来其经济状况恶化，68%称拉丁裔在美国的处境比一年前更糟（该调查引述时注明，为何转变发生是分析问题而非既定事实）。
郊区选民方面，LeTourneau大学政治学教授约翰·巴雷特（John Barrett）称，大量传统上投票给共和党的郊区选民这次投票给了民主党，拉丁裔选民亦然。数据中心方面，希诺霍萨竞选主张在州议会通过保护措施前冻结新数据中心建设，并终结该州对这类设施的税收减免；德克萨斯州拥有全美至2030年规划数据中心容量的逾四分之一；《世界报》县级分析显示，阿马里洛所在的两个县民主党得票逾40%（2024年无人代表民主党参选），阿比林所在县共和党得票下降5个百分点但仍赢得70%，佩科斯以西里夫斯县（Reeves County，雪佛龙与微软联合开发项目所在地）共和党较2024年下降20个百分点，民主党人当选。
公立学校与移民执法方面，德克萨斯州新闻编辑室调查记者奥西巴莫沃（Toluwani Osibamowo，KUT奥斯汀视频解说）称，农村共和党选民投票率低与选票翻转的因素包括阿博特的学校代金券计划与数据中心建设热潮，文化战争议题这次没有像以往那样赢得选民。自特朗普2025年1月再次就职以来，移民与海关执法局在其哈灵根与圣安东尼奥辖区逮捕逾50,000人，其中哈灵根辖区（覆盖里奥格兰德河谷大部分地区）约20,000人（Data Deportation Project逮捕数据，经Texas Observer报道）；Texas Observer称，移民与海关执法局自特朗普再次就职以来特别针对该地区，执法与生活成本并列为该地区最突出的选举议题。
共和党方面的说法：特朗普在社交媒体发帖称阿博特为“RINO”。克鲁兹说：“德州会重新变红。”“我们还没有突然变成一群吃豆腐、禁枪、穿芭蕾舞裙的粉红共产自由派。那不是我们。德州还是德州。”巴雷特说：“她将无法迫使任何立法通过州议会……这意味着将出现分治政府，他们将不得不妥协。”“我不知道拉丁裔选民会成为任何人的忠实选民。我认为这些将是紫色选民，是可以争取的。”共和党将保住德克萨斯州参议院（《德克萨斯论坛报》，经Daily Caller转引）。共和党顾问（KUT视频解说）称当晚为对州与国家层面共和党权力的“彻底否决”，指出即使在去年为有利于共和党而划分的国会选区与县选区也出现失利。
五、对2028年大选的意义
夜幕落下之后，被问得最多的问题是：它对下届总统大选意味着什么。
历史规律：只写有来源的说法
布鲁金斯学会（2025年8月28日评论文章）写道，自1938年以来22次中期选举中，总统所在政党在20次中失去了众议院席位，两次例外均有特殊情况（2002年因9·11袭击，布什总统在选举日的支持率为63%）；总统工作支持率对中期选举众议院结果有强烈影响；过去三十年，每当总统净支持率（支持减去反对）在中期选举前一年为负，其政党便在众议院失去席位。同文还写道：“中期选举结果并不能预测随后总统选举的获胜者。1982年中期选举民主党增加26个众议院席位，燃起了民主党的希望，但未能挽救沃尔特·蒙代尔（Walter Mondale）在1984年遭遇罗纳德·里根的压倒性失败。反之，1994年民主党失去54个席位似乎使比尔·克林顿的总统职位岌岌可危，但他随后以八个百分点的优势击败共和党提名人鲍勃·多尔（Bob Dole）。”
萨巴托水晶球（Sabato's Crystal Ball，弗吉尼亚大学政治中心）的康迪克（Kyle Kondik）说：“中期选举应与总统选举分开看待……中期选举不一定能预测总统选举结果。”“总统不在中期选举选票上，总统竞选的投票率更大。”2010年民主党的中期选举失利并未阻止奥巴马2012年连任；共和党在2018年与2020年两次都处于下风，但2020年明显比2018年更有竞争力；即使共和党2026年表现非常糟糕，也不一定对2028年意味着什么；许多2026年不投票的选民会在2028年投票。
阿布拉莫维茨（Alan Abramowitz）与奥恩斯坦（Norman Ornstein）在《华盛顿邮报》2010年8月15日的文章中写道：“中期选举在很大程度上由短期因素决定，包括总统的受欢迎程度与经济状况。因此，它们很少能说明长期趋势，对随后总统与国会选举的结果没有任何预测价值。总统所在政党遭遇重大中期选举失利的总统，如1946年的哈里·杜鲁门、1982年的罗纳德·里根与1994年的比尔·克林顿，两年后都轻松赢得连任。”补充历史数字：克林顿1994年失去54个众议院席位与8个参议院席位，奥巴马2010年失去63个众议院席位与6个参议院席位，两人两年后均轻松连任；特朗普的共和党2018年失去40个众议院席位、净增2个参议院席位。
抛开预测，分治政府对眼前这段任期的影响，却是实打实的。
分治政府对特朗普剩余任期的实际影响
特朗普还有两年任期；民主党控制两院后，美国进入分治政府时期（《今日美国》10月20日）。两道障碍是参议院阻挠议事与特朗普的否决权；推翻否决需两院各三分之二多数（众议院290票、参议院67票，按全体议员投票计）。民主党承诺聚焦可负担性并追究特朗普政府的责任；共和党则发誓在特朗普最后两年继续推进边境安全与国内化石燃料生产等特朗普优先事项。新一届国会将于1月第一周召开（路透社）。众议院民主党人可以第三次弹劾特朗普，但参议院没有定罪所需的三分之二多数；两次弹劾并未阻止他；民主党是否愿意罢免其最喜欢的对手、把总统职位交给副总统万斯并使其在2028年获得两年先发优势，也是一个问题（此为《今日美国》10月27日评论文章的观点，须注明出处）。
11月3日选出的州长将在各州主持2028年总统选举。德克萨斯州拥有40张选举人票（《今日美国》德克萨斯州分析文章）。
2028年被提及的人物：只写有来源的提名，无一人确认参选
民主党方面，路透社11月5日报道，民主党正转向可能是数十年来最拥挤、最不可预测的总统初选之一；没有民主党人成为明确热门人选；潜在人选包括现任州长与参议员，多人近几个月来一直在培养捐款人、访问早期提名州、提高全国知名度。路透社联系了九名最知名的潜在参选人的代表，无一人确认参选。被提及的名字（路透社经American Bazaar转引）：前副总统哈里斯（Kamala Harris，2024年败给特朗普）、加州州长纽森（Gavin Newsom）、肯塔基州州长贝希尔（Andy Beshear）、前交通部长布蒂吉格（Pete Buttigieg）、纽约州众议员奥卡西奥-科尔特斯（Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez）。另有参议员范霍伦曾暗示可能竞选2028年总统（路透社）。民主党战略人士费尔森（Scott Ferson）估计，至少30名民主党人正在与身边人讨论参加总统竞选的可能。民主党11月12日将在丹佛聚会（Majority Democrats主办），预计党内意识形态分歧将成为议题。
共和党方面，潜在人选较少，领头者为副总统万斯与国务卿鲁比奥（Marco Rubio，路透社）；特朗普依法不得寻求第三任期。德克萨斯州参议员克鲁兹对2028年竞选总统的兴趣毫不掩饰（《今日美国》11月5日）。有线电视新闻网的分析称，11月3日的结果是共和党在特朗普政府之外，超越万斯与鲁比奥，寻找2028年提名人的理由；即将离任的佐治亚州州长肯普（Brian Kemp）与特朗普主义的联系更少。
民主党内部辩论（路透社）：尽管11月3日的结果，民主党在2028年竞选开始时仍在医疗、税收、警务与外交政策等问题上就是否向中间靠拢还是进一步左倾存在分歧；索斯尼克称，进步派与温和派都将声称其意识形态路径得到验证。共和党方面的挑战（路透社）：共和党候选人将面临不同挑战：如何在11月3日对其政策的否决后与特朗普保持距离；需要扩大对总统基本盘之外的吸引力，同时避免与已定义该党的“让美国再次伟大”民粹运动决裂；特朗普十年来主导政治格局，可能不愿让出中心舞台，其对MAGA追随者的持续影响可能使该党下一任旗手的道路复杂化。
《今日美国》11月5日分析认为，民主党面临的关键考验在于如何平衡可负担性与问责两大优先事项；一些人担心，若民主党不解决特朗普关税政策与伊朗战争驱动的价格上涨，这些靠生活成本赢得的席位可能同样迅速失去；近期民调显示民主党支持率低于水位线，但明显高于特朗普。
六、计票还在继续
故事讲到最后，要回到那些还悬着的选战。截至11月5日，密西西比州参议员之争尚未判定，领先只有1,813票，地方认证截止11月13日；阿拉斯加州参议员首选票领先637票，排序投票11月18日进行，约75,000张选票仍未计；加州选票仍在计，第40号提案与第5号提案未判定，加州认证截止12月11日；州议会与公投案的数字仍在变动。
回头看，提前投票5,753万张创了纪录，但65岁以上选民占提前选票约半数，18至29岁选民约占8%且较2022年同期增长59%；投票率的年龄结构与投票选择的年龄分化并列呈现。州议会至少九个议院易手、41项数据中心地方公投中40项有利于限制开发、德克萨斯州254个县全部向民主党方向移动——这些被头条忽略的数字，是这次选举在州与县一级留下的记录。
计票还在继续，认证尚未完成，最后的数字要等官方结果落定。笔者会继续跟进这些尚未判定的选战，直到它们都有了答案。（《The Star》栏目组）
关联：杰弗里斯正式宣布竞选众议院议长：称报复与弹劾特朗普不是民主党的优先事项；德克萨斯州当选州长希诺霍萨公布跨党派过渡团队：共和党前州议员任共同主席
资料引用：美联社、全国广播公司、路透社、《今日美国》、全国州议会联合会、Ballotpedia、佛罗里达大学选举实验室发布的选举统计与选民民调
[Feature] 《The 2026 Midterms: Voters, Prices and War》
By The Star, GSM's features desk
Voting took place on November 3, 2026, and counting is still under way. The Associated Press count as of the morning of November 6 showed 405 of the 435 House seats called — 249 for Democrats and 156 for Republicans, with 30 still uncalled; Democrats retook the Senate, 54 seats to 44, with two races uncalled; in Texas, Hinojosa defeated incumbent Governor Abbott. The House popular vote stood at about 60.21 million to 46.84 million in the November 5 count. Those figures have been reported everywhere. This article uses them only as anchors and does not rewrite them.
It does not retell the national headline of control of the two chambers. Instead it reads the election from the layers least reported: state legislatures, ballot measures, county-level movement, races still uncalled, who voted and who did not, and the structure of the money. The thread running through it is the three things voters said mattered most — the cost of living, health care and war. Each party is given equal space, with every statement attributed; the Texas section reports vote facts only; on 2028, only sourced claims are used.
1. The results, in numbers
Senate: seven seats changed hands
Before the election Republicans held 53 seats to the Democrats' 47; Democrats gained a net seven. AP and NBC data on November 5 showed Democrats 54 to Republicans 44, with Mississippi and Alaska uncalled; other trackers that day ranged from 53 to 55. No Democratic seat flipped to Republicans.
In North Carolina, Roy Cooper beat Michael Whatley 58.7% to 39.1%, a margin of 19.6 points — the first flip of the night, called by AP at 8:23 p.m. Eastern; the state's first Democratic senator since 2008, for the seat vacated by retiring Thom Tillis. In 2020 the same seat went Republican by 1.8 points.
In Texas, James Talarico beat Ken Paxton 55.1% to 43.0%, 5,445,121 votes to 4,249,752, a margin of 12.1 points. Talarico is Texas's first Democratic senator since Lloyd Bentsen in 1988; Paxton had beaten John Cornyn in the Republican primary. It was the most expensive Senate race in the country.
In Maine, Troy Jackson beat incumbent Susan Collins 53.8% to 46.1%, a margin of about seven points (another tracker had 53.4% to 46.5%; the gap is consistent). Collins had served since 1996 and was seeking a sixth term. In 2020 the same seat went Republican by 8.6 points.
In the Ohio special election, Sherrod Brown beat incumbent Jon Husted 50.0% to 45.2%, 2,301,042 votes to 2,077,748, for a term ending January 3, 2029. In 2022 the same seat went Republican by 6.1 points.
In Iowa, Josh Turek beat Ashley Hinson 50.5% to 46.4%, 686,487 votes to 630,615. This was the call that locked the Senate majority, made by AP at 11:35 p.m. Eastern, for the seat vacated by retiring Joni Ernst; Iowa's first Democratic senator since 2008.
In Kansas, Adam Hamilton led by about 4.9 points; Kansas last had a Democratic senator in 1932. In South Carolina, Annie Andrews led by about 4.4 points; the seat has been Republican since Strom Thurmond switched parties in 1964.
Two other seats were holds, not flips: in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed was called the winner by AP at 2:27 a.m. Eastern on November 4, the first Muslim elected to the U.S. Senate, holding a Democratic seat; in Georgia Jon Ossoff was reelected and in the Florida special election Ashley Moody won, both holds.
Governors: five seats changed hands
Thirty-six governorships were on the ballot. Before the election Republicans held 26 states to the Democrats' 24; after it, Democrats held at least 28 to Republicans' 20, with Kansas and Alaska uncalled. AP called it the first Democratic majority of governorships since 2006.
In Texas, Gina Hinojosa beat incumbent Greg Abbott 52.8% to 45.7% (AP, 98% counted). In Georgia, Keisha Lance Bottoms won 54.3% to 45.7%, the state's first Black woman governor; Georgia's last Democratic governor left office in 2003. In Ohio, Amy Acton won 52.3% to 44.4%, the state's first elected woman governor; Ohio's last Democratic governor predated the 2010 election. In Iowa, Rob Sand won 55.5% to 44.5%, ending a decade of Republican control of state government. In Nevada, Aaron Ford beat incumbent Joe Lombardo 51.7% to 44.2%, giving Democrats the governorship and both legislative chambers — a trifecta.
Texas and Nevada were incumbent defeats; Ohio, Iowa and Georgia were open seats. Of the 22 governor candidates endorsed by Trump, 10 won and 11 lost, with Alaska uncalled; of 27 Trump-endorsed candidates challenging Democratic seats, none had flipped one as of 3 p.m. Eastern on November 4 (USA Today analysis).
State legislatures: at least nine chambers changed hands
At least nine state legislative chambers flipped from Republican to Democratic, all in the Democrats' direction; another count put the figure at "as many as 12 chambers" (Axios, via Newsmax; see the sourcing note at the end). Control of the legislature changed in seven states (MultiState, as of 6:45 p.m. Eastern on November 4): New Hampshire and Wisconsin flipped both chambers; Michigan (House), Minnesota (House, previously tied 67–67), Pennsylvania (Senate), North Carolina (House) and Texas (House) each flipped one chamber. Alaska, Arizona and Georgia were uncalled at the time.
In New Hampshire, Democrats took the House with 292 seats and the Senate 15–9; Republican Governor Kelly Ayotte was reelected, but the loss of both chambers ended the state's Republican trifecta. In Wisconsin, Democrats flipped three Senate seats for 18 in total and all eight targeted House seats, 53–46, ending a Republican legislative majority held since 2011; Governor David Crowley (Democrat) won. In Pennsylvania, Governor Josh Shapiro claimed a Senate split of 26–24, ending 32 years of Republican control of that chamber; the state has a Democratic governor and both chambers for the first time since 1994, and its first trifecta since 1992.
In Arizona, Governor Katie Hobbs was reelected; Democrats could flip both chambers, which would be the state's first trifecta since 1966 and its first full legislative control in 60 years. In Michigan the House flipped and the Senate was held, with Governor Jocelyn Benson (Democrat) winning, forming a trifecta. In Minnesota the House was won by Democrats after a 67–67 tie and the Senate held, with Governor Amy Klobuchar (Democrat) winning, forming a trifecta. In North Carolina the House flipped — Republicans 71 to Democrats 49 before, Democrats 70 of 120 seats after — while the Senate stayed Republican, moving the state from Republican control to divided government. In Texas the House flipped, the first Democratic control since Republicans took it after the 2002 election, while the Senate stayed Republican. In Georgia the House was leaning Democratic; a flip would be the first Democratic control since before the 2004 election, and was uncalled.
Trifectas: Democrats added Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin; Republicans lost Georgia, Iowa, Ohio and Texas (National Conference of State Legislatures; another count says five states, including New Hampshire). Democrats hold trifectas in 22 states to Republicans' 18 (Newsmax, citing AP). Democrats broke or blocked Republican supermajorities in nine chambers across eight states: Florida, South Carolina, Indiana, Missouri, Iowa, Ohio, Kansas and North Carolina. If current leads hold, Democrats would control 51 of the country's 99 legislative chambers, up from 39. Katie Owens Hubler, the NCSL's director of elections and redistricting, called it the largest single-election shift in state-government party power since 2010.
Ballot measures: voters deciding directly
California had 14 statewide propositions (preliminary results of November 4, with mail ballots still being counted). Proposition 39 (requiring voter identification) was rejected, about 59% voting no (AP: 58.6% no to 41.4% yes, about 60% counted). Proposition 40 (a one-time 5% tax on assets over $1 billion, 90% for health care) was still uncalled: as of the evening of November 5, AP's live count had No at 4,733,204 votes and Yes at 3,928,206, No leading by about 55%, with AP not yet calling it. Proposition 3 (making a temporary income tax on high earners permanent, for schools and health care) passed with 58.7%. Proposition 1 (a $11.25 billion housing bond) passed with 59% in favour; Proposition 37 (a $25 billion low-interest homebuyer loan programme) passed with 61%; Proposition 2 (raising the rainy-day fund cap) passed with 60%. Proposition 44 (community clinic spending requirements) was rejected, about 82% voting no. Propositions 41 and 42 were competing alternatives to Proposition 40: Proposition 42 was leading with 55% support, Proposition 41 trailing (47.5% to 52.5%); either, if passed with more yes votes than Proposition 40, would block Proposition 40 from taking effect. Proposition 5 (changing recall procedures) led by less than one point, the measure most likely to flip as counting continued; Proposition 45 (environmental review rules) trailed by about eight points. In the governor's race, Xavier Becerra (Democrat) beat Steve Hilton, called by AP at 8:12 p.m. Pacific, leading by nearly 28 points.
Elsewhere (Ballotpedia summary): on abortion, Missouri Amendment 3 and Idaho Proposition 1 failed, Nevada Question 6 and Virginia Question 1 passed. On basic rights, Virginia Question 2 (marriage equality), Vermont Proposition 4 (anti-discrimination), Vermont Proposition 3 (unions) and Arkansas Issue 4 (clean water funding) passed. On schools, Alabama Amendments 3 and 4 (oath, prayer, national anthem) passed; Arizona Proposition 142 (banning DEI) failed and Proposition 318 (transgender bathrooms and sports) passed; Nebraska Initiative 442 (sports by biological sex) passed; North Dakota Measure 2 (free school meals) failed. On voting and elections, Alaska Issue 3, Arkansas Issue 1, a Kansas citizenship voting requirement, South Dakota Amendment J and a West Virginia citizenship voting requirement passed; Virginia Amendment 3 (restoring voting rights to people with felony convictions) passed; Montana I-194 (banning corporate donations) passed. On voter identification, nine states had measures requiring photo ID or citizen-only voting; all but two passed, including Ohio Issue 1 with 65.3%, while Arizona Proposition 144 was on the edge of rejection, 53.2% no to 46.8% yes with about 85% counted.
On data centres, a little-reported layer: of 41 local referendums, 40 produced results favouring limits on data-centre development — 27 approved restrictions and 13 rejected pro-development proposals. The approved limits included five full bans (California, Florida, Ohio), 12 partial bans (Kansas, Maine, Ohio), three six-month pauses in Maine and two zoning measures in Adams County, Ohio. All 18 municipalities in Ohio that voted on the issue passed limits. The only pro-development result was the rejection of one review requirement in Harwood, North Dakota.
Races still uncalled
Mississippi Senate: Democrat Scott Colom leads Republican incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith. As of the afternoon of November 5, AP's live count had Colom at 466,775 votes to Hyde-Smith's 464,962, a lead of 1,813, with 99.83% of precincts reporting; AP has not called it. The lead has moved repeatedly as counting continued: it was 43 votes on election night and 1,724 in the morning batch of November 5. About 3,600 mail ballots can still arrive, affidavit ballots are being verified, local certification is due November 13, and the state has no recount law.
Alaska Senate: Democrat Mary Peltola leads Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan by 637 first-choice votes, with about 75,000 ballots still uncounted; the ranked-choice tabulation is set for November 18. Preliminary ranked-choice modelling from the ballots counted so far puts the two near a tie, with Sullivan slightly ahead after transfers — a preliminary model, not a result.
The Alaska and Kansas governor's races were also uncalled: in Kansas, Holscher led Masterson 50.3% to 49.7%; in Alaska, Kreiss-Tomkins led Wilson 49.2% to 29.2%, according to NBC's projection at 12:30 p.m. on November 4. In the House, 42 seats were uncalled as of the early hours of November 5 (NBC); the number of Democratic flips was moving — 32 in USA Today's evening count of November 4, 31 by Decision Desk HQ — each a snapshot at a different time.
Early voting: 57.53 million ballots, a record
The University of Florida's Election Lab counted 57,530,789 early votes as of 6:40 p.m. Eastern on November 2 — 31,872,117 in-person early votes and 25,658,672 returned mail ballots. Final early voting in the 2022 midterms was 45,920,446; 2026 was about 11.6 million more, an increase of about 24% to 25%, which AFP called a midterm record. The most early votes came from Texas (over 7.7 million) and Florida (over 5.4 million). There is no verified final total turnout yet; NBC's Decision Desk estimated that overall turnout as of 6:30 p.m. on Election Day was tracking close to 2022.
By party registration (27 states that publish it): Democrats about 43% to 44%, Republicans about 31% to 32%, unaffiliated or minor-party about 25%. Party registration is not the same as vote choice, as multiple sources note.
By age — data others used little: nationally, voters aged 18 to 29 made up about 8% of early voters and those aged 30 to 39 about 9%, with under-40s about 17% in total; about 9.1 million under-40s voted early or by absentee ballot, including nearly 3.5 million aged 18 to 29, up 59% on the same point in 2022. State snapshots show voters 65 and older making up more than half of early ballots in most states: Michigan 60.5% aged 65 and over and 5.5% aged 18 to 29; Florida 56.9% and 2.8% aged 18 to 24; Ohio 56.5% and 3.5%; California 52.9% and 4.0%; Georgia 41.4% and 5.2%. In Georgia, about 310,000 voters aged 18 to 29 cast early ballots, about 11% of 2.8 million early ballots; voters 50 and older made up nearly 65% of early ballots; in the first nine days of early voting, in-person voting by under-30s rose 54% on 2022, and young Black voters rose 80%. In the four Dallas–Fort Worth counties (Dallas, Tarrant, Collin, Denton), as of October 28, turnout among registered voters 65 and older was about 50.5%, against 18.4% for those aged 18 to 29 — about 2.7 times higher.
The structure of the money
Federal Election Commission figures for the 12-month period (as summarised): congressional candidates raised $1.49 billion and spent $851.9 million; political action committees raised $4.61 billion; outside groups spent $2.51 billion independently, including $1.33 billion by conservative groups, $880 million by liberal groups and $302.6 million by nonpartisan or single-issue groups.
Small donations differed sharply by party: Democratic congressional candidates received $588.7 million in donations under $200, against $140 million for Republicans; small donations were 44% of Democratic fundraising and 34% of Republican fundraising; donations of $2,500 or more were 37% of Republican fundraising and 25% of Democratic fundraising. By candidate: Talarico raised $75.3 million in small donations against Paxton's $5.37 million; Ossoff raised $66.1 million against Mike Collins's $2.72 million. ActBlue (the Democrats' main online fundraising platform) grew from 4.9 million donors to about 6.6 million; WinRed (the Republicans' main platform) had about 1.5 million donors this cycle; Talarico alone attracted about as many ActBlue donors as all Republican candidates and committees combined drew through WinRed. ActBlue reported processing $833 million in the third quarter of 2026, its best non-presidential quarter ever, up 29% on the third quarter of 2022.
On large donations: Elon Musk gave $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund in September, about 58% of that fund's income for the month; the fund has spent $358.7 million. Talarico raised over $134 million across the cycle, including a record $64 million in the third quarter, with about 97% of donations at $100 or below; Ossoff raised $109.2 million, with over 98% of third-quarter donations below $100 and an average of $38. VoteHub's analysis warned against treating fundraising as a decisive predictor of results: "Campaign finance is not the clearest signal of November performance."
2. What voters said
The AP Voter Poll was conducted by SSRS for AP, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News Media, NBC and Versant, covering more than 100,000 voters in 50 states — Alaska from October 19 to November 3, other states from October 22 to November 3.
On issues: about nine in ten voters called the cost of living a "critical" or "important" factor in their House vote, and about six in ten of those backed Democratic House candidates. Government corruption tied the cost of living at the top: about half of voters called government corruption and the cost of living "crucial" to their House vote; in NBC's exit poll, about nine in ten respondents called each a critical or important factor. Preliminary AP/NBC voter-poll data (November 4) put the share calling each issue a critical or important factor at: government corruption 90%, cost of living 89%, the Iran war 74%, immigration enforcement 73%, artificial intelligence and data centres 56%. About four in ten voters called the economy the country's most important issue, and about three in ten named the state of democracy.
Pre-election polls for comparison: an AP–NORC poll of October 8–12 (1,119 adults, margin of error ±3.9 points) found 85% calling the economy and 84% the cost of living the most important issues; 74% disapproved of Trump's handling of the economy and 79% of his handling of the cost of living; 64% disapproved of Trump overall; eight in ten wanted major change or a complete overhaul in how the country is run. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found 47% of registered voters calling the cost of living the most important factor in their vote, and 73% saying the cost of living was heading in the wrong direction. A Gallup poll of October 29 found the economy and health care tied at 50% as "extremely important", followed by the Iran conflict at 47%, income inequality at 44%, gasoline prices at 42% and immigration at 40%.
On who is blamed for prices and war, in poll numbers only: about two-thirds of voters said Trump's own policies fuelled inflation, against about half blaming Biden's policies in the 2022 midterms. Consumer prices rose 3.7% over the past 12 months, up from a 3% inflation rate at the start of Trump's second term. About six in ten voters called the U.S. military action against Iran a "wrong decision"; about six in ten said government immigration enforcement had "gone too far", and a similar share disapproved of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's performance. Eighty-six percent of Americans said the war harms the cost of living, including 76% of Republicans. About three-quart-fourths of voters said they felt "angry" or "dissatisfied" with the direction of the country, and only about one-fourth "satisfied" or "enthusiastic". About six in ten voters supported a larger government role in lowering health-care costs, and about six in ten believed artificial intelligence will harm society, fearing job losses and financial instability. On economic trust, Trump led by seven points in 2024; in 2026 Democrats led by six.
Age and ethnicity, in cross-tabs: voters aged 18 to 29 backed Democratic House candidates 72% to 25%; ages 30 to 44, 60% to 36%; ages 45 to 64, 51% to 47%; ages 65 and over, 48% to 51%. First-time voters aged 18 to 24 backed Democrats 76% to 21%. In 2024, voters aged 18 to 29 backed Trump 55% to 42%. About nine in ten Black voters backed Democratic House candidates, up from about eight in ten backing Harris in 2024; Black women backed Democrats almost unanimously; only about one in ten Black men backed Republicans, down from about one in four backing Trump in 2024. Hispanic voters backed Democratic House candidates by about six in ten, against about one-third for Republicans; in 2024 about four in ten Hispanic voters voted for Trump. About seven in ten Hispanic voters said Trump's policies had worsened the U.S. economy.
Moderates and low-income voters: eight in ten moderate voters said Congress was doing "not enough" to check presidential power. Among voters earning under $50,000, 39% said inflation caused severe hardship, against 15% of high earners; more than half of low-income voters chose Democrats in 2026, while the group split evenly between Trump and Harris in 2024. Six in ten voters under 30 said they voted specifically against the president; about seven in ten voters wanted Congress to do more to check presidential power.
Data centres also entered voters' calculations: an NBC poll found 23% of voters saying data centres played a "key" role in their vote, and 33% calling the issue key. A University of Massachusetts Amherst poll in September found only 11% of Americans favouring a data centre being built where they live, and 65% opposed. In Shelby County, Tennessee (Memphis, home of Musk's Colossus data centre), the Democratic vote share rose from 71% to about 85%.
3. What each party said
Democrats
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, expected to become Speaker, told CNN: "We campaigned on affordability, we won a decisive victory on affordability, and now we have a responsibility to govern on affordability." He also said: "You will have a Congress that understands we don't work for the president." And: "We will fight for the heartland of America." The House Democratic Caucus will meet next week and publish its agenda; the new majority's focus is "affordability and accountability". In the same interview Jeffries said Democrats still had a responsibility to ensure "wrongdoers in the Trump administration are held accountable".
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, confident of becoming majority leader, called the result a "generational" realignment, while warning his party had no blank cheque to legislate beyond what Americans want: "Voters did not give us the majority to do whatever we want." In his victory speech he told Americans who backed Democrats five words: "Relief is on the way." On November 5, at a Washington forum hosted by the Center for American Progress, he said lowering costs must be the top priority and affordability "must be the most important thing". Schumer told reporters Democrats would work to lower prices while investigating when they believed the government had acted unlawfully.
The Democrats' consensus agenda for the new Congress (Reuters, interviewing newly elected and returning members): make Affordable Care Act plans more affordable, reverse some of Trump's cuts to Medicaid (the government health programme for people on low incomes), and end tariffs and the Iran war. Democratic plans (Wall Street Journal, via Newsmax): revisit Trump's large tax-and-spending law, including Medicaid work requirements, food-aid cuts and tax provisions favouring businesses and wealthy Americans; restore expanded Affordable Care Act subsidies, address housing costs, consider changes to Social Security financing (including raising the payroll-tax income cap); challenge Trump tariffs, address energy prices and seek an end to the Iran war (ABC).
Divisions inside the party (Reuters): beyond broad agreement on "affordability", Democrats disagree on whether voters authorised vigorous investigation of Trump and his family, impeachment or embracing progressive priorities such as Medicare for All. Reuters quoted an unnamed Democratic leader: "I have not had a single member of the House Democratic Caucus talk to me about impeachment." Accountability work will be led by Jamie Raskin (Maryland), the Democrats' leader on the House Judiciary Committee, and Robert Garcia (California), the Democrats' leader on the House Oversight Committee.
Senator Chris Van Hollen (Maryland Democrat, who has hinted he may run for president in 2028) said Democrats need to pursue several goals at once, including holding the government accountable for "serious corruption", working to end the Iran war and uniting behind a positive economic agenda for working-class Americans. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said the result reflected a broader shift among the groups that helped Trump win the White House. Labour activist Saru Jayaraman (who advocates raising the federal minimum wage) said Democrats should "show their cards" and put forward the policies they want to form their presidential platform: "What better way to win the 2028 election than to pass these bills in the House and Senate, put them on the president's desk and see whether he signs them?" Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, speaking at the Center for American Progress event, said medical debt and student debt were also issues Democrats should address at the federal level, and that oversight and affordability should be Congress's main focus next year.
Democratic strategist Doug Sosnik (Reuters) said: "Last night's results, Democrats of every stripe can find affirmation in." He added that progressives and moderates would both claim their ideological path had been vindicated, and that a fierce intraparty fight would come as the 2028 race formally began.
Republicans
President Donald Trump, asked about Vice President Vance's claim that the Iran war cost Republicans the election, said it was "basically true" but that he had no regrets. He told reporters the Iran war had "raised gasoline a little in the short term", but that he believed fighting to stop Iran advancing nuclear weapons was worth it. After the Texas governor's race, he posted on social media calling Abbott a "RINO" (Republican in name only). On election night he had urged voters to pretend he was on the ballot; the day after the election he visited the White House ballroom construction site and talked about non-election matters (USA Today live coverage, November 4).
Vice President JD Vance wrote on social media: "We lost because of the war." He added: "The president himself said so last night." According to Blaze Media's summary of his long social-media post, Vance said Republicans lost because many voters who backed Trump and Vance in 2024 turned out this time and voted Democratic; polls showed the top reasons for switching were ending the war, focusing on the cost of living and inflation, America First, and changing the relationship with Israel. He defended Rachel Campos Duffy, warned against an expected "whitewash" and amnesty proposals, and urged supporters to turn their anger into electing like-minded Republicans.
Senator Ted Cruz of Texas (Republican, openly interested in a 2028 presidential run, not up for reelection before 2030) wrote in a long social-media post on November 4: "Texas is blue. Those are hard words to say. But today, at least today, Texas is blue." "As of today, I am the only remaining statewide elected Republican in Texas. Those are words I never thought I would say." He also wrote: "2026 was not just a blue wave; it was a blue tsunami. It was a shellacking. It was not just a bad 2006 midterm. It was a Watergate-level repudiation." Cruz said: "Tariffs made everything too expensive, and the Iran war dragged on too long." "Voters are angry, and elected Republicans have not done enough to address their very real pain." He called on Trump to end the war still under way, and called the newly elected Senator Talarico to congratulate him. Cruz also said: "Texas will turn red again." "We will rebuild as a true blue-collar party, not by embracing socialism, but by being true free-market conservatives." He warned Democrats would "overreach" and "go too far", possibly advancing what he called a "radical transgender agenda", and that "many Americans will be hurt. Texans will be hurt." He said Republicans had lost key voters — blue-collar voters, evangelical Christians, farmers and ranchers, young people and Hispanics — because the party had not done enough to address their pain.
House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana (Republican) had said for weeks that the polls were wrong and Republicans would "defy history" and keep the House majority; he has now said he will not run for House minority leader (CNN).
Among Texas Republican voters (Washington Examiner reporting, via Newsmax), at least some blamed Trump and congressional Republican leaders for the defeats; some also blamed Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and Speaker Johnson; the factors they named included Trump tariffs, rising consumer prices, the Iran war and tough immigration enforcement; some called for a leadership change before the 2028 presidential election. Steve Meng, a 35-year-old grocery-store clerk, said: "In 2028, I want to say to the Republican Party: get rid of Trump and Vance and move on."
CNN's analysis (not a quotation) held that Trump made the campaign overwhelmingly about himself; that he intervened in Republican primaries, producing candidates who were harder to elect (a repeat of 2018); that late in the campaign he dismissed affordability concerns and repeatedly focused on unpopular topics such as the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool; and that Republicans still plainly dared not blame him.
4. Texas
The numbers
Governor: Hinojosa 5,230,929 votes to Abbott's 4,524,955 (AP, 99% of precincts reporting). Hinojosa is Texas's first Latino governor; the first Democratic governor since Ann Richards was elected in 1990 (Richards served 1991–1995); Democrats won a Texas statewide election for the first time since 1994. Abbott called Hinojosa to congratulate her at about 10 p.m. Central on election night, saying: "After looking at all the details from every county in the state, I decided to call to congratulate her on winning the Texas governor's race… Mathematically, we cannot win this election." Hinojosa takes office on January 19, 2027.
Senator: Talarico 5,445,121 votes to Paxton's 4,249,752, 55.1% to 43.0%. Lieutenant governor: Vikki Goodwin beat incumbent Dan Patrick 51.7% to 45.7%. The attorney general's office went to a Democrat; Jon Rosenthal won the Railroad Commission, becoming the first Jewish candidate elected to statewide executive office in Texas. Democrats were positioned to win every statewide office on the ballot and had a chance to take control of the Texas House (USA Today, November 4).
Texas House: Democrats gained at least 18 seats (unofficial results); control was uncalled; a flip would be the first Democratic control since Republicans took it after the 2002 election. Republicans were expected to keep the Texas Senate (Texas Tribune, via Daily Caller).
Abbott's background: a three-term governor who won his first three governor's races by double-digit margins; he began the year with more than $100 million in funds; from July to late September he outspent Hinojosa on advertising by a wide margin (a USA Today opinion article put the ratio at 6 to 1; another count put it at 5 to 1 — different measures; see the sourcing note).
County by county
All 254 Texas counties moved in the Democrats' direction; not one moved toward Republicans. The median shift was 17.7 points; the smallest was King County at 6.6 points (the Republican advantage falling from +91.1 to +84.5); the largest was Starr County at 71.8 points. Twenty-eight counties Trump won in 2024 voted for Talarico in 2026. The figures are unofficial results from the Texas Secretary of State (as of 11:48 a.m. Eastern on November 4; some counties not fully counted).
Border counties: Starr County went from Trump leading by 16.0 points in 2024 to Talarico leading by 55.8 points; Zapata moved 63.1 points; Maverick 59.5 points; Webb, Hidalgo and Cameron (each with over 50,000 Senate votes) moved 49.5, 49.3 and 44.3 points respectively. Brewster County (home of Big Bend National Park): Abbott led by nearly nine points in 2022, Trump by 13 points and Cruz by over 10 points in 2024; in 2026 Hinojosa flipped it by eight points and Talarico won it by over 10 points. Starr County: Trump led by 16 points and Cruz by two points in 2024; in 2026 Hinojosa led by nearly 50 points and Talarico by nearly 55 points. Maverick County: Cruz led by three points in 2024; in 2026 Talarico led by 45 points.
Suburbs and big cities: Collin County went from Trump +11.1 to Talarico +12.1; Denton from +13.1 to +8.4; Williamson from +2.5 to +20.3; all three voted for Trump in 2024 and for Talarico in 2026. Tarrant County, home of Fort Worth, flipped (Trump +5.1 to Talarico +19.2); Harris moved 27.4 points toward Democrats, Bexar 25.7, Dallas 23.3 and Travis 19.2. Fort Bend moved 27.6 points (only 100 of 202 precincts reported).
Rural counties: all 171 rural counties in the state moved toward Democrats in the governor and Senate races; in the governor's race rural Texas moved more than eight points toward Democrats on 2022, and in the Senate race 7.5 points on 2024 (2024 was a presidential year, with a different turnout pattern from a midterm, so the two cannot be directly compared); rural voters were about 10.5% of the electorate, down from 11.3% in the 2022 midterm. All 16 border counties together moved more than eight points toward Democrats.
The four Rio Grande Valley counties (Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, Willacy): Talarico and Hinojosa won about 60% to over 70%; in Hidalgo County Talarico won over 72% and Hinojosa over 70%; in Cameron County Trump won 52% in 2024, while in 2026 the Trump camp won 30% and Hinojosa 70% (Domingo Garcia, president of LULAC Adelante PAC, via FOX 7 Austin); Webb County (Laredo) moved 26 points, with Paxton at 25% against Trump's 51% in 2024; in Maverick County Trump won 59% in 2024, while in 2026 Paxton won 28% and Talarico and Hinojosa 72%. According to LULAC, about 1.6 million Latino voters voted in Texas, nearly double the 900,000 in the last midterm; counties with Latino majorities gave 72% of their votes to Democrats.
State House seats in the Rio Grande Valley: Janice Lopez (San Benito state representative) lost the HD-37 seat to Oziel Ochoa, flipping it back to the Democrats; Denise Villalobos (Republican incumbent state representative, Corpus Christi) lost; Kristian Carranza beat Jorge Borrego to win HD-118 (southeastern San Antonio suburbs); Julio Salinas (a progressive backed by Bernie Sanders) beat MAGA Republican Gary Groves in McAllen to win HD-41.
Why it flipped: sourced claims only, from both sides
From Democrats and related analysis: a return of Latino voters. Latinos make up about 30% to one-third of Texas voters (Brandon Rottinghaus, a Texas political scientist; USA Today). Trump won 55% of the Texas Latino vote in 2024, up 13 points on 2020 and 27 points on 2016, a record for a Republican presidential candidate, and won all four Rio Grande Valley counties, ending a century of Democratic control of the region. Pre-election polls: an Equis Research poll in October showed Talarico leading Paxton 58% to 33% among Latino voters and Hinojosa leading Abbott 59% to 35%; a BSP Research poll for UnidosUS showed Talarico leading among Latino voters 65% to 31%, and in the Rio Grande Valley 74% to 24%. The AP Voter Poll showed about six in ten Hispanic voters in the Texas Senate race backing Talarico and about three in ten backing Paxton; in 2024 Hispanic voters in the state were far more divided between Trump and Harris.
Rottinghaus's analysis is that Democrats traditionally won about 60% of the Latino vote in Texas, fell to near 50% in the 2024 cycle, and saw the figure recover this year; high support in majority-Latino communities was the main driver of Talarico's vote total; and the result shows Texas becoming more politically competitive, with Latino voting patterns, suburban communities and changes in traditionally Republican rural counties together driving the Democratic success. On issues, the Equis Research October poll showed rising prices and immigration enforcement as the two issues Latino voters cared about most. A Pew survey found 61% of Latino respondents saying their economic situation had worsened since Trump took office, and 68% saying Latinos in the U.S. were worse off than a year earlier (noted when cited as an analytical question, not an established fact, about why the shift happened).
On suburban voters, John Barrett, a political science professor at LeTourneau University, said large numbers of traditionally Republican suburban voters voted Democratic this time, as did Latino voters. On data centres, Hinojosa campaigned on freezing new data-centre construction until the legislature passed protections, and ending the state's tax breaks for such facilities; Texas holds more than a quarter of planned U.S. data-centre capacity to 2030; a Le Monde county analysis found Democratic votes above 40% in the two Amarillo counties (no Democrat stood in 2024), the Republican vote down five points in the Abilene county while still winning 70%, and in Reeves County west of Pecos (home of a joint Chevron–Microsoft project) the Republican vote down 20 points on 2024, with a Democrat elected.
On public schools and immigration enforcement, Toluwani Osibamowo, an investigative reporter with the Texas Newsroom (KUT Austin video explainer), said factors in low rural Republican turnout and the flipped votes included Abbott's school voucher programme and the data-centre building boom, and that culture-war issues did not win voters this time as they had before. Since Trump took office again in January 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested more than 50,000 people in its Harlingen and San Antonio areas of responsibility, including about 20,000 in the Harlingen area (covering most of the Rio Grande Valley) (Data Deportation Project arrest data, via Texas Observer); Texas Observer said ICE had particularly targeted the region since Trump returned to office, and that enforcement and the cost of living were jointly the region's most prominent election issues.
From Republicans: Trump posted on social media calling Abbott a "RINO". Cruz said: "Texas will turn red again." "We have not suddenly become a bunch of tofu-eating, gun-banning, pinko commie liberals in ballet skirts. That is not us. Texas is still Texas." Barrett said: "She will not be able to force any legislation through the state legislature… That means there will be divided government, and they will have to compromise." "I don't know that Latino voters are going to be loyal voters for anybody. I think these are going to be purple voters, voters that can be won." Republicans will keep the Texas Senate (Texas Tribune, via Daily Caller). A Republican consultant (KUT video explainer) called the night a "thorough repudiation" of Republican power at the state and national level, noting losses even in congressional and county districts drawn last year to favour Republicans.
5. What it means for the 2028 election
History: sourced claims only
The Brookings Institution (commentary, August 28, 2025) wrote that in 22 midterm elections since 1938, the president's party lost House seats in 20, with special circumstances in the two exceptions (2002, after the 9/11 attacks, when President Bush's approval rating was 63% on Election Day); presidential approval strongly affects midterm House results; and in the past thirty years, whenever the president's net approval (approve minus disapprove) was negative in the year before a midterm, his party lost House seats. The same article wrote: "Midterm results do not predict the winner of the subsequent presidential election. Democrats gained 26 House seats in the 1982 midterm, raising Democratic hopes, but that did not save Walter Mondale from a crushing defeat to Ronald Reagan in 1984. Conversely, Democrats losing 54 seats in 1994 seemed to put Bill Clinton's presidency in jeopardy, but he then beat Republican nominee Bob Dole by eight points."
Kyle Kondik of Sabato's Crystal Ball (University of Virginia Center for Politics) said: "Midterms should be viewed separately from presidential elections… Midterms do not necessarily predict presidential election results." "The president is not on the midterm ballot, and turnout is larger in presidential campaigns." Democrats' midterm losses in 2010 did not stop Obama being reelected in 2012; Republicans were down in both 2018 and 2020, but clearly more competitive in 2020 than in 2018; even a very bad Republican performance in 2026 does not necessarily mean anything for 2028; many voters who do not vote in 2026 will vote in 2028.
Alan Abramowitz and Norman Ornstein wrote in the Washington Post on August 15, 2010: "Midterm elections are driven largely by short-term factors, including the president's popularity and the state of the economy. They therefore say little about long-term trends and have no predictive value for the results of subsequent presidential and congressional elections. Presidents whose parties suffered major midterm losses — Harry Truman in 1946, Ronald Reagan in 1982 and Bill Clinton in 1994 — all won reelection easily two years later." Further historical figures: Clinton lost 54 House seats and eight Senate seats in 1994, Obama lost 63 House seats and six Senate seats in 2010, and both were reelected easily two years later; Trump's Republicans lost 40 House seats and gained a net two Senate seats in 2018.
What divided government means for the rest of Trump's term
Trump has two years left in office; with Democrats controlling both chambers, the U.S. enters a period of divided government (USA Today, October 20). The two obstacles are the Senate filibuster and Trump's veto; overriding a veto requires a two-thirds majority in each chamber (290 votes in the House, 67 in the Senate, counting all members voting). Democrats have promised to focus on affordability and hold the Trump administration to account; Republicans have vowed to keep advancing Trump's priorities in his final two years, including border security and domestic fossil-fuel production. The new Congress convenes in the first week of January (Reuters). House Democrats could impeach Trump a third time, but the Senate lacks the two-thirds majority needed to convict; two impeachments did not stop him; whether Democrats would want to remove their favourite opponent, hand the presidency to Vice President Vance and give him a two-year head start in 2028 is also a question — this is the view of a USA Today opinion article of October 27, 2026, and is attributed as such.
The governors elected on November 3 will oversee the 2028 presidential election in their states. Texas holds 40 electoral votes (USA Today Texas analysis).
Names mentioned for 2028: sourced mentions only; no one has confirmed running
On the Democratic side, Reuters reported on November 5 that Democrats were turning to what could be one of the most crowded and unpredictable presidential primaries in decades; no Democrat had emerged as a clear favourite; potential candidates include sitting governors and senators, many of whom have spent recent months cultivating donors, visiting early nominating states and raising their national profiles. Reuters contacted representatives of the nine best-known potential candidates; none confirmed running. The names mentioned (Reuters, via American Bazaar): former Vice President Kamala Harris (who lost to Trump in 2024), California Governor Gavin Newsom, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Senator Chris Van Hollen has also hinted he may run for president in 2028 (Reuters). Democratic strategist Scott Ferson estimated that at least 30 Democrats were discussing a possible presidential run with people around them. Democrats gather in Denver on November 12 (hosted by Majority Democrats), where intraparty ideological divisions are expected to be on the agenda.
On the Republican side, the field is smaller, led by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio (Reuters); Trump is barred by law from seeking a third term. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas makes no secret of his interest in running for president in 2028 (USA Today, November 5). CNN's analysis held that the November 3 result was a reason for Republicans to look beyond the Trump administration — beyond Vance and Rubio — for a 2028 nominee; outgoing Georgia Governor Brian Kemp has fewer ties to Trumpism.
On the Democratic internal debate (Reuters): despite the November 3 result, Democrats remain divided as the 2028 race begins over whether to move toward the centre or further left on health care, taxes, policing and foreign policy; Sosnik said progressives and moderates would both claim their ideological path had been vindicated. On the Republican challenge (Reuters): Republican candidates will face a different challenge — how to distance themselves from Trump after the November 3 rejection of his policies; they need to broaden their appeal beyond the president's base while avoiding a break with the "Make America Great Again" populist movement that has defined the party; Trump has dominated politics for a decade and may be unwilling to give up the centre stage, and his continuing hold over MAGA followers could complicate the path for the party's next standard-bearer.
A USA Today analysis of November 5 held that the key test for Democrats is balancing affordability and accountability; some fear that if Democrats do not address the price rises driven by Trump tariffs and the Iran war, the seats won on the cost of living could be lost just as quickly; recent polls show Democratic support below water, but clearly above Trump's.
6. A close in facts
Back to the facts as they stood on November 5, with counting still under way: the Mississippi Senate race led by 1,813 votes and uncalled, with local certification due November 13; the Alaska Senate race led by 637 first-choice votes, with the ranked-choice tabulation on November 18 and about 75,000 ballots still uncounted; California ballots still being counted, Propositions 40 and 5 uncalled, with California certification due December 11; state-legislature and ballot-measure figures still moving.
Early voting set a record at 57.53 million ballots, yet voters 65 and older made up about half of early ballots, voters aged 18 to 29 about 8% — up 59% on the same point in 2022; the age structure of turnout sits alongside the age divide in vote choice. At least nine state legislative chambers changed hands, 40 of 41 local data-centre referendums favoured limits on development, and all 254 Texas counties moved in the Democrats' direction — figures the headlines ignored, and the record this election leaves at state and county level.
Counting continues, certification comes later, and official results are the final word. (The Star)
Related: Jeffries Formally Announces Speaker Bid, Says Retaliation and Impeaching Trump Are Not Priorities; Texas Governor-elect Hinojosa Names Bipartisan Transition Team, With a Former GOP Lawmaker as Co-Chair
Reference: election counts and voter surveys published by the Associated Press, NBC, Reuters, USA Today, the National Conference of State Legislatures, Ballotpedia and the University of Florida Election Lab
发布：GSM·美国（发布链接）
图片来源：图：美国国会大厦穹顶夜景。本届中期选举后，美国参众两院控制权易手。图片来源：Wikimedia Commons，peakfocus.agency，CC BY 4.0 / Photo: The dome of the U.S. Capitol at dusk, Washington. Image: Wikimedia Commons, peakfocus.agency, CC BY 4.0
GSM Global · 本篇英文版 English edition of this story
