基辅近郊国民警卫队驻地外爆发冲突：「地下室关押动员人员」说法引发抗议 乌克兰国家调查局立案
2026年11月2日晚，乌克兰首都基辅西郊、基辅州布恰区的 Petropavlivska Borshchahivka 村，一处由乌克兰国民警卫队使用的民宅外发生冲突：约100名居民聚集抗议，与到场的警察和国民警卫队人员对峙推搡。冲突的起因，是当天在社交平台流传的说法——数十名被动员的男子被关在这栋民宅的地下室里、遭到殴打，还有人被拒绝救治。
据自由欧洲电台／自由电台（RFE/RL）与《基辅独立报》记者在现场的报道，聚集者中包括自称屋内人员家属的居民，有人要求进入民宅、高喊「里面的人在受折磨」，还有人向警用巴士投掷石块和鸡蛋、试图推翻车辆并砸坏警车警灯，防暴警察使用了催泪瓦斯；乌克兰公共广播公司 Suspilne 报道，现场还传出警告射击的声音。基辅警方表示，警方最初是接到一支私人救护队人员的报警，称他们被阻拦、无法救治一名身份不明者。
国民警卫队司令 Oleksandr Pivnenko 当晚亲自到场向群众说明：这栋民宅是军方租用的临时安置与办理地点，被动员的人员在此完成登记和检查后被送往训练中心，屋内还包括擅自离开部队后被带回的军人。国民警卫队第一军团（「亚速」军团）表示，屋内有17名新近被动员的人员，以及等待处理擅自离队事项的军人；各方对屋内总人数的说法不一，从14人到25人不等。四名军人报告身体不适并被送往医院，亚速军团确认四人受伤，并表示如果证实存在非法使用武力，责任人将被惩处。
11月3日，乌克兰国家调查局宣布，已按乌克兰《刑法》第426-1条第5款（军职人员滥用职权）开启刑事程序，调查军人是否被违背意愿关押、军方人员的行为是否越权，调查人员已与检察机关、国家警察和军事监察员办公室代表一同在现场工作。国民警卫队同时启动内部调查，内务部长 Ivan Vyhivskyi 下令就事件展开官方调查。乌克兰安全局则对骚乱本身另行立案，称已识别约100名积极参与者并考虑实施拘捕，同时调查事件是否存在有组织挑动的成分；总统办公室主任 Kyrylo Budanov 当晚也赶到现场，并称这是一场「摆拍的宣传行动」。乌克兰人权监察员 Dmytro Lubinets 要求军方说明驻地人员的任务及其行为的合法性。
基辅州警方明确表示，关于人员被非法关押以及「一人死亡」的报道不属实。警方与乌克兰调查媒体 Slidstvo.Info 还指出，最初散播关押说法的一名女子自称是私人救护公司的负责人，但该公司已于2023年停业、现场出现的救护车两年前就已售出；这些细节与「摆拍」说法是否成立，仍有待调查结论。截至发稿，殴打与折磨的指控没有得到官方证实，国家调查局表示将区分已核实信息与未经证实的说法。
这起冲突再次凸显乌克兰动员制度的长期摩擦。乌克兰的兵员征集由各地的征兵与社会支持中心执行，征兵人员开着小巴在街头强行带走适龄男子的做法被民间称为「巴士化」，长期广受诟病；据监察员办公室数据，2025年该办公室收到6000多起涉及征兵违规的投诉。自2022年2月俄罗斯全面入侵以来战争持续至今，乌克兰军方与政府在补充前线兵员上面临持续压力。
（来源：乌克兰国家调查局）
Clashes Erupt Outside National Guard Site Near Kyiv Over Claims Mobilised Men Were Held in a Basement; Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation Opens Case
On the evening of November 2, 2026, clashes broke out outside a private house used by Ukraine's National Guard in the village of Petropavlivska Borshchahivka, in Bucha Raion of Kyiv Oblast on the western outskirts of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv: about 100 residents gathered in protest and confronted police and National Guard personnel at the scene. The confrontation was triggered by claims spreading on social media that day — that several dozen mobilised men were being held in the house's basement, had been beaten, and were being denied medical care.
According to RFE/RL and Kyiv Independent reporters at the scene, the crowd included people who said they were relatives of the men inside; some demanded to be let into the house and shouted that people inside were being tortured, while others pelted a police bus with rocks and eggs, tried to overturn the vehicle and smashed police car lights, as riot police used tear gas. Ukrainian public broadcaster Suspilne reported that warning shots were also heard. Kyiv police said officers were first called by a private ambulance crew who said they were being prevented from treating an unidentified person.
National Guard commander Oleksandr Pivnenko came to the site that evening and told the crowd that the house is a leased temporary accommodation and processing point where mobilised personnel complete registration and checks before being sent to a training centre, and that the men inside also included servicemen brought back after leaving their units without authorisation. The National Guard's 1st Corps ("Azov") said the house held 17 newly mobilised men and servicemen awaiting proceedings over unauthorised absence; accounts of the total number of people inside varied, from 14 to 25. Four servicemen reported medical problems and were taken to hospital; the Azov Corps confirmed that all four had sustained injuries and said those responsible would be punished if unlawful use of force was proven.
On November 3, Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation announced that it had opened criminal proceedings under Part 5 of Article 426-1 of the Criminal Code (abuse of authority by a military official) to examine whether servicemen had been held against their will and whether military personnel had exceeded their powers, with investigators working at the scene alongside the prosecutor's office, the national police and the military ombudsman's office. The National Guard launched an internal investigation, and Interior Minister Ivan Vyhivskyi ordered an official inquiry into the events. Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) separately opened cases into the unrest itself, saying it had identified about 100 active participants and was considering detentions, while examining whether the episode had been an organised provocation; Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Presidential Office, who also came to the scene, called it a staged propaganda operation. Ukraine's human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets demanded clarity about the tasks of the personnel at the site and the legality of their actions.
Kyiv regional police stated plainly that reports of unlawful detention and of one person having died were false. Police and the Ukrainian investigative outlet Slidstvo.Info also noted that the woman who first spread the detention claims had presented herself as the owner of a private ambulance company, but the company had ceased operating in 2023 and the ambulance seen at the scene had been sold two years earlier; whether these details support the "staged" account remains for the investigations to establish. As of publication, the allegations of beatings and torture had not been officially confirmed, and the State Bureau of Investigation said it would distinguish verified information from unconfirmed claims.
The clash once again exposed long-running friction over Ukraine's mobilisation system. Recruitment is run by territorial recruitment and social support centres, and the widely resented practice of recruiters driving around in minibuses and forcibly detaining men believed to be evading service — dubbed "busification" — has drawn persistent public anger; according to the ombudsman's office, it received more than 6,000 complaints about possible violations during recruitment in 2025. With the war continuing since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine's military and government face sustained pressure to keep replenishing front-line units.
(Source: State Bureau of Investigation of Ukraine)
来源：乌克兰国家调查局
发布：GSM·美国（发布链接）
图片来源：图：事发地乌克兰基辅州 Petropavlivska Borshchahivka 村街景资料图。公共领域，经 Wikimedia Commons。 / Photo: Street scene in the village of Petropavlivska Borshchahivka, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine, where the clash took place, file photo. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
GSM Global · 本篇英文版 English edition of this story
