洛杉矶无家可归拨款诉讼时间线：LAHSA起诉联邦政府、法院下初步禁令，第九巡回大体驳回HUD暂缓动议

围绕洛杉矶无家可归联邦拨款资格的诉讼，2026年9月24日迎来关键节点：美国联邦第九巡回上诉法院以2比1裁决，大体驳回住房与城市发展部（HUD）要求暂缓执行初步禁令的动议，洛杉矶无家可归者服务局（LAHSA）得以继续代表加州洛杉矶县洛杉矶市地区统筹申请联邦拨款。此案自6月29日LAHSA起诉以来，三个月内历经起诉、地方法院下达初步禁令、联邦政府上诉三个阶段，正式审判尚未开庭。

第一阶段是起诉。6月29日，LAHSA向加州中区联邦地区法院提起诉讼（案号2:26-cv-07056），被告为唐纳德·特朗普总统、HUD及部长斯科特·特纳，主张暂停决定超越联邦权限、违反《行政程序法》，且属任意专断，并同日申请临时限制令。LAHSA临时首席执行官吉塔·奥尼尔（Gita O'Neill）表示：「我们采取这一步，是为了保护已经找到永久住所的人。」洛杉矶持续照护体系随后作为参加诉讼人加入原告一方。7月2日，主审法官戴维·O·卡特（David O. Carter）将临时限制令申请转为初步禁令动议审理。

第二阶段是初步禁令。8月13日，卡特法官批准初步禁令，认定HUD的暂停做法任意专断，下令恢复LAHSA作为地区「协作申请方」等职权。裁决书指出，暂停的实际效果是洛杉矶地区无法申请2026财政年度的联邦无家可归拨款，牵涉国会已为该地区拨划的约2.41亿美元，以及85个城市逾1.1万人赖以维持住房与服务的资源；本案正式审判排定于2027年2月举行。8月19日，联邦政府向第九巡回上诉法院提起上诉。

第三阶段是上诉法院的裁决。9月24日，由法官杰奎琳·阮（Jacqueline Nguyen）、瑞安·尼尔森（Ryan Nelson）与鲁帕利·德赛（Roopali Desai）组成的合议庭裁定，暂缓动议「部分准予、大体驳回」：恢复LAHSA四项职权——协作申请方、无家可归者管理信息系统负责人、协调准入系统协调方与年度时点统计负责人——的命令不予暂缓；命HUD执行2025财政年度已批准拨款协议的命令不予暂缓；仅涉及一笔拨付款项的一小部分命令获准暂缓。合议庭指出，HUD「选择在一个会让洛杉矶地区格外脆弱的时点」暂停LAHSA，其影响落在弱势人群、关键项目与持续中的服务上。尼尔森法官对裁决的主要部分持异议。

裁决之后，本年度联邦拨款申请的截止日期定为10月14日。HUD回应称，该部坚持暂停决定的合法性，将遵守第九巡回法院的临时命令，并期待上诉法院就实体问题作出完整裁决。奥尼尔表示，LAHSA正全速推进，以赶上申请截止日期。

关联：HUD暂停LAHSA联邦拨款资格：监察长立案调查涉欺诈与管理不善，约2.39亿美元申请受阻

关联：众议院无家可归资金听证：Bass称日程冲突拒绝出席作证，小组主席称传票选项不排除

关联：洛杉矶市长 Karen Bass 承认无家可归治理失误：应更早改造体系，主张市府自建独立系统

来源：GSM·美国

LA Homeless Funding Lawsuit Timeline: LAHSA Sues, Federal Court Grants Preliminary Injunction, Ninth Circuit Largely Denies HUD's Bid to Pause It

The lawsuit over Los Angeles' federal homelessness funding reached a key point on September 24, 2026: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 to largely deny the Department of Housing and Urban Development's motion to stay a preliminary injunction, allowing the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) to keep administering federal funding applications for the region in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California. Since LAHSA filed suit on June 29, the case has moved through three stages in three months — the complaint, a district court injunction, and the federal government's appeal — with a trial still to come.

The first stage was the lawsuit itself. On June 29, LAHSA sued President Donald J. Trump, HUD, and Secretary Scott Turner in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 2:26-cv-07056), arguing the suspension exceeded federal authority, violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and was arbitrary and capricious, and it applied the same day for a temporary restraining order. "We are taking this step to protect formerly unhoused people who found a permanent home," said LAHSA Interim Chief Executive Officer Gita O'Neill. The Los Angeles Continuum of Care later joined the case as a plaintiff-intervenor. On July 2, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter converted the restraining-order application into a motion for a preliminary injunction.

The second stage was the injunction. On August 13, Judge Carter granted a preliminary injunction, finding that HUD had acted arbitrarily and capriciously and ordering LAHSA's authority restored, including its role as the region's collaborative applicant. The order noted that the practical effect of the suspension was to bar the Los Angeles region from applying for fiscal year 2026 federal homelessness funding, putting at stake approximately $241 million already earmarked by Congress for the region and resources serving more than 11,000 people in 85 cities. A trial was set for February 2027. On August 19, the federal government appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

The third stage was the appeals court's ruling. On September 24, a panel of Circuit Judges Jacqueline Nguyen, Ryan Nelson, and Roopali Desai granted HUD's stay motion in part and denied it in large part: the order reinstating LAHSA in four roles — collaborative applicant, Homeless Management Information Systems lead, Coordinated Entry System coordinator, and point-in-time count administrator — was left in force, as was the order requiring HUD to execute signed agreements for approved fiscal year 2025 grants; a stay was granted only as to a small portion of the order concerning one disbursement of funds. The panel wrote that HUD "chose to suspend LAHSA at a time when it would leave the Los Angeles region particularly vulnerable," with ill effects on vulnerable populations, critical programs, and ongoing services. Judge Nelson dissented from the principal parts of the ruling.

After the ruling, the application deadline for this year's federal funding cycle was set for October 14. HUD responded that it stands by the lawfulness of its suspension, will comply with the Ninth Circuit's temporary order, and looks forward to the court's full resolution on the merits. O'Neill said LAHSA was "moving at full speed" to meet the application deadline.

Related: HUD Suspends LAHSA's Federal Funding Eligibility: Inspector General Probe Into Fraud and Mismanagement Puts About $239 Million Application on Hold

Related: House Hearing on Homelessness Funds: Bass Declines to Testify Citing Schedule Conflict as Chairman Keeps Subpoena Option Open

Related: LA Mayor Karen Bass Admits Mistakes on Homelessness: Says She Should Have Transformed the System Earlier, Now Backs a New City-Run System

Source: GSM America

来源：GSM·美国（原文链接）

图片来源：洛杉矶市中心第一街美国联邦法院大楼外立面，LAHSA诉联邦政府案由加州中区联邦地区法院审理。CC0，经 Wikimedia Commons。 / Exterior facade of the First Street U.S. Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles; the LAHSA case is before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

本市最新更多 ›

加州洛杉矶县洛杉矶市圣费尔南多路高速公路旁露宿营地10月29日遭清查 25人以上被捕2026-10-29加州洛杉矶县洛杉矶市台湾舞团HUNG DANCE 10月29日晚南加州大学首演《BIRDY》免费开放2026-10-29

← 返回城市　全部新闻　关于我们