国际刑事法院再裁定：老杜特尔特案一涉案事件被剔除，中方否认阻挠仁爱礁医疗后送
10月11日的菲律宾新闻版面被两条涉外司法与海上消息占据。据《马尼拉时报》10月11日要闻，国际刑事法院（ICC）第三审判分庭裁定，将检方指控清单中的第57号事件从前总统罗德里戈·杜特尔特的案件中剔除，理由是该事件落在一项已确认指控的时间范围之外；分庭同时驳回了辩方对指控形式的更广泛挑战。这份10月9日的裁定要求检方在10月16日前更新证人名单、证据清单与审判摘要，以反映该事件的移除。
ICC的另一起裁定已于10月8日公开：分庭认定老杜特尔特健康状况可以出庭受审，驳回辩方关于其无法有效参与诉讼的主张，并拒绝追加医学检查，但允许每小时休庭、助听设备等便利措施。两项裁定合起来意味着：海牙的审判在程序上继续推进，只是检方的事件清单瘦身了一项。
同一天的另一条消息来自南海：中方否认中国海警故意阻碍菲律宾海岸警卫队在仁爱礁（菲称阿云津礁）的医疗后送行动，并指责马尼拉歪曲事实。据菲方说法，10月8日，中方海警5306舰以水炮阻滞菲方医疗后送船只近10小时。菲中双方就仁爱礁的对峙近年反复发生，医疗后送受阻的说法使本已紧张的海上局势再添摩擦点。
ICC裁定属程序性步骤，实体审判尚未开始；南海事件目前仍处双方各执一词阶段，后续以双方官方文件与正式通报为准。
ICC Trims One Incident From Rodrigo Duterte's Case as China Denies Blocking Ayungin Medical Evacuation
Two items with international dimensions led Philippine coverage on October 11. The Manila Times reported that the International Criminal Court's Trial Chamber III has ordered prosecutors to remove one alleged incident — Incident 57 — from the case against former president Rodrigo Duterte, after finding it fell outside the time frame of a confirmed charge, while rejecting the defense's broader challenge to the form of the charges. The decision, dated October 9, directed the prosecution to update its witness list, evidence list and trial brief by October 16 to reflect the removal.
A companion ICC ruling had been made public on October 8: the chamber found the elder Duterte fit to stand trial, rejecting defense claims that he cannot effectively participate, and refused additional medical examinations while allowing accommodations such as hourly breaks and hearing aids. Together the rulings mean the Hague proceedings continue on procedure, with the prosecution's incident list trimmed by one.
The day's other lead came from the South China Sea: China denied that its coast guard intentionally obstructed a Philippine Coast Guard medical evacuation at Ayungin Shoal, accusing Manila of distorting the facts. The Philippine side said that on October 8, China Coast Guard vessel 5306 delayed the evacuation by nearly 10 hours, using a water cannon on a Philippine ship. Standoffs at the shoal have recurred for years, and a disputed medical evacuation adds a fresh friction point.
The ICC rulings are procedural steps, with the substantive trial still ahead, and the shoal incident remains contested by both sides, pending official documents and statements from each capital.
图片来源：图：位于海牙的国际刑事法院大楼。摄影：Choinowski，CC BY-SA 4.0，取自 Wikimedia Commons
